fix(codecs): handle single-chunk GELF messages directly - #26300
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This was referenced Sep 3, 2026
2 tasks
thomasqueirozb
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Motivation
A one-chunk GELF message is already complete, but the decoder sent it through the pending-message path. That created unnecessary state and made message-ID ownership harder to enforce.
Changes
References
Related: #26137
Stack: #26299 -> #26300 -> #26301 -> #26302
Vector configuration
Not applicable; the decoder behavior is exercised directly.
How did you test this PR?
Focused tests exercise source-buffer ownership and pending message-ID reuse.
Does this PR include user facing changes?
no-changeloglabel to this PR.Contributor Guidelines
@vectordotdev/vectorto reach out to us regarding this PR.