Enforce Ruff lint in package CI - #345
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
uriahf
changed the title
uriahf
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 20, 2026 18:22
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
ruff check .in the Python package workflowScope
Developer tooling only. No runtime dependencies, statistical calculations, or public API changes.
Formatting enforcement is intentionally deferred to a separate follow-up PR because
ruff format --check .identified 21 files that need a mechanical baseline reformat. Keeping that work separate makes both changes easy to review.