Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
95 changes: 95 additions & 0 deletions marketing/COMMUNITY_POSTS.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
# Community post drafts

These drafts deliberately use different frames. Before posting, read the current
community rules, search for recent project posts, disclose that you built
SourceBraid, and participate in the discussion. Never post all three on the same
day or reuse an identical title and body.

## r/selfhosted

Suggested title:

> I built a GitHub-backed web-to-Markdown archive with no central content server

Draft:

> I have been building SourceBraid, an open-source tool that saves web pages,
> papers, wikis, Gists, and PDFs as Markdown in a private GitHub repository the
> user controls.
>
> I want to be precise about the "self-hosted" angle: SourceBraid is not a server
> you deploy, and it depends on GitHub as the durable remote store. There is no
> central SourceBraid content service. The Markdown files, assets, metadata
> shards, and Git history live in the selected repository; the SQLite full-text
> index is a disposable local cache.
>
> Capture is available through the public clients listed here: {{PUBLIC_URL}}.
> PDF conversion can run in the user's repository through GitHub Actions and
> Docling. The project is MIT-licensed: {{REPOSITORY_URL}}.
>
> I would value a self-hosting community critique of this architecture. Does a
> user-controlled GitHub repository provide a useful ownership boundary for this
> workflow, or is a non-Git remote backend important before you would consider
> using it?

## r/PKMS

Suggested title:

> My web-clipping workflow now ends in portable Markdown instead of another inbox

Draft:

> I built SourceBraid around a simple personal-knowledge-management preference:
> after I save a source, I want a readable file with provenance, not only a URL
> and not a record trapped inside a service.
>
> SourceBraid captures articles, research papers, wikis, Gists, and PDFs into a
> private GitHub repository. It adds YAML frontmatter, keeps relevant images as
> relative assets, records notes and tags, and uses Git history for inspectable
> changes. A ChatGPT/Codex plugin can search and fetch the resulting archive.
>
> Demo: {{DEMO_URL}}
> Source: {{REPOSITORY_URL}}
>
> I am interested in how people would fit this into an existing PKM system. Would
> you keep the captured archive separate from your own notes, link the two, or
> import selected sources into the same vault? I am trying to preserve the
> distinction between source material and personal synthesis.

## r/opensource

Suggested title:

> SourceBraid: an MIT-licensed web-to-Markdown archive built on Git history

Draft:

> I am releasing SourceBraid, an open-source capture and retrieval workflow for
> people who want their web research as portable Markdown.
>
> The capture clients save pages, papers, wikis, Gists, and PDFs into a private
> GitHub repository selected by the user. The project has no central content
> server. Markdown and Git history are authoritative, while the local SQLite
> search index can be deleted and rebuilt. The code is MIT-licensed, with a
> Manifest V3 Chrome extension, a native iOS app/Share Extension, and a
> dependency-free Python plugin for ChatGPT and Codex. Remove any client from
> this sentence that is not public for `{{VERSION}}`.
>
> Repository: {{REPOSITORY_URL}}
> Release: {{RELEASE_URL}}
>
> The areas where contributions would be most useful are reproducible extraction
> fixtures, accessibility feedback, additional trustworthy source adapters, and
> review of the permission and privacy explanations. Please do not include real
> private archives or copyrighted captured material in issues or test fixtures.

## Moderation and follow-up

- If a moderator removes a post, do not repost it without permission.
- Answer architectural criticism with concrete tradeoffs and documentation.
- Move reproducible bugs to GitHub Issues only after acknowledging them in the
original thread.
- Do not treat disagreement about GitHub as hostility; it is a central product
tradeoff and useful launch feedback.
- Record repeated questions for the week-one launch recap.
90 changes: 90 additions & 0 deletions marketing/DEMO_SCRIPT.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
# 60-second demo script

## Demo contract

Show a complete, truthful path from source to owned Markdown to retrieval. Use a
new private synthetic repository and either SourceBraid's own public material or
a source with clearly verified redistribution permission. Record no personal
tabs, browser history, notifications, tokens, existing private repository names,
or existing private clips.

Rehearse once from a clean public installation. Keep the pointer still except
when it identifies the next action, and make every label readable at 1080p.

## Storyboard

### 0-6 seconds: the outcome

Visual: A useful public source in Chrome. Cut briefly to its clean Markdown file
in the synthetic private GitHub repository.

Voiceover:

> This source will still be useful to me if the page changes or the app goes
> away. SourceBraid turns it into Markdown in a GitHub repository I control.

On-screen text:

> Web to Markdown. Your repository.

### 6-18 seconds: capture

Visual: Open SourceBraid, add the synthetic tag `demo` and note `Review the
provenance section`, then select **Save to GitHub**.

Voiceover:

> I can add my own tags and notes before saving. SourceBraid chooses the best
> available extraction path and preserves where the source came from.

Do not expose the GitHub token or expand settings during the recording.

### 18-34 seconds: inspect the archive

Visual: Open the resulting Markdown file. Point out the YAML frontmatter,
readable body, relative image reference when present, and normal Git commit.

Voiceover:

> The result is an ordinary Markdown file with provenance, local assets when
> needed, and normal Git history. The archive remains understandable without a
> proprietary SourceBraid format.

### 34-50 seconds: retrieve

Visual: In ChatGPT or Codex, use the public plugin path and ask:

> Search my SourceBraid archive for the demo source and show its provenance.

Show the matching result and source path. Do not show a deletion operation in
the primary demo; it distracts from the capture-to-retrieval story.

Voiceover:

> The SourceBraid plugin searches the archive and returns the saved source with
> its repository path and provenance.

### 50-60 seconds: trust and action

Visual: Three quick frames: Chrome capture, Markdown repository, search result.
End on the product name and one public install URL.

Voiceover:

> There is no central SourceBraid content server. Your archive lives in the
> GitHub repository you choose. SourceBraid is open source and available at
> sourcebraid.com.

On-screen text:

> SourceBraid - Weave the web into Markdown.

## Export checklist

- [ ] The exact clients shown are publicly available.
- [ ] The source and all visible content are redistributable.
- [ ] Captions match the spoken script.
- [ ] No token, account identifier, private content, or personal browser chrome
appears in any frame.
- [ ] The final CTA resolves in a signed-out browser.
- [ ] A silent viewer can understand the three-step story.
134 changes: 134 additions & 0 deletions marketing/GITHUB.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
# GitHub launch metadata

Repository: `patrickschiller/sourcebraid`

## About section

Description:

> Weave the web into durable Markdown in your own GitHub repository.

Website:

> https://sourcebraid.com

The social preview should use
`assets/branding/sourcebraid-social-card.png` and must be checked at desktop and
mobile sizes before launch.

## Topics

Use this initial topic set:

```text
web-clipper
markdown
read-it-later
web-archiving
personal-knowledge-management
knowledge-base
browser-extension
chrome-extension
ios
github
privacy
mcp-server
codex-plugin
full-text-search
pdf-to-markdown
```

Apply the set after authenticating `gh` as a repository administrator:

```bash
gh repo edit patrickschiller/sourcebraid \
--add-topic web-clipper \
--add-topic markdown \
--add-topic read-it-later \
--add-topic web-archiving \
--add-topic personal-knowledge-management \
--add-topic knowledge-base \
--add-topic browser-extension \
--add-topic chrome-extension \
--add-topic ios \
--add-topic github \
--add-topic privacy \
--add-topic mcp-server \
--add-topic codex-plugin \
--add-topic full-text-search \
--add-topic pdf-to-markdown
```

The order above starts with user intent and moves toward implementation details.
Do not add `self-hosted`, `local-first`, or `offline-first` unless the product
contract changes enough to make those expectations accurate.

Review topics for every coordinated public release and once per quarter. Remove
a topic when the corresponding user-facing behavior is no longer supported.
Add a topic only when it describes a shipped, documented capability. Twice a
year, compare the vocabulary used by adjacent web-clipping and archiving
projects; do not copy irrelevant implementation topics merely because they are
popular.

## Repository features

Before the public launch:

- apply and verify the documented topic set on the live repository;
- enable GitHub Discussions;
- retain Issues for actionable bugs and feature work;
- create Discussion categories `Announcements`, `Ideas`, `Q&A`, and
`Show and tell`;
- pin a welcome discussion explaining when to use Discussions versus Issues;
- publish the coordinated GitHub release and attach the allowlisted artifacts;
- verify the README's primary install links point to published destinations;
- verify the English and German READMEs describe the same available clients.

Suggested welcome discussion title:

> Welcome to SourceBraid: questions, workflows, and ideas

Suggested welcome text:

> SourceBraid is an open-source web-to-Markdown archive built around files and
> Git history that the user controls. Use Q&A for setup questions, Ideas for
> early product discussion, and Show and tell for workflows you have built.
> Please use Issues for reproducible bugs and scoped implementation requests.
> Do not post access tokens, private repository names, or captured content that
> you do not have permission to share.

## Release description template

```markdown
# SourceBraid {{VERSION}}

SourceBraid saves web pages, papers, wikis, Gists, and PDFs as portable Markdown
in a private GitHub repository controlled by the user. This coordinated release
includes the supported capture clients and ChatGPT/Codex archive tools listed
below.

## Install

- Chrome: {{CHROME_STORE_URL}}
- iPhone and iPad: {{APP_STORE_URL}}
- ChatGPT and Codex plugin: {{PLUGIN_URL}}

Remove any installation line whose destination is not public for this release.

## Highlights

- [Three verified, user-visible highlights for this exact release]

## Privacy and permissions

SourceBraid has no central content server. Capture clients write to the GitHub
repository selected by the user. Review the permissions and data flow in the
[privacy notice](https://github.com/patrickschiller/sourcebraid/blob/main/PRIVACY.md).

## Checks

- `node --test tests/capture-utils.test.js`
- `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p "test_*.py"`
- unsigned iOS simulator build
- public release safety and artifact inspection
```
Loading