[release-4.22] OCPBUGS-99228: Fix node.kubernetes.io/exclude-from-external-load-balancers on masters - #130
Conversation
…balancers on masters We previously used allHaveNodePrefix() to ensure that if a master instance group contained the bootstrap machine this would not cause it to be excluded from re-use. This worked because the bootstrap machine's name has the same prefix as all other machines in the cluster. However, this logic unconditionally always included the master instance group. If the masters are labelled with node.kubernetes.io/exclude-from-external-load-balancers the CCM framework code will have filtered the Nodes before passing them to provider-GCP. But this logic meant we added them anyway, sending unintended traffic to the control plane machines.
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84569 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99228. Will retitle bug to link to clone. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99228, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99228, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
@mdbooth: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mdbooth, theobarberbany The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test okd-scos-images |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
2e28a1a
into
openshift:release-4.22
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99228 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99228 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: new pull request created: #142 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Fix included in release 4.22.0-0.nightly-2026-09-02-125503 |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #121
/assign mdbooth
/cherrypick release-4.21 release-4.20