refactor: StatusCode.isError() for audit outcome checks#430
Merged
Conversation
three audit sites computed success with a bare @intFromEnum(status) < 400. name the intent with StatusCode.isError() (>= 400) on the type itself.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
follow-up from the review. three audited handlers (app apply, app rollback,
agent register) decided success/failure with a bare
@intFromEnum(resp.status) < 400.move the intent onto the type as
StatusCode.isError()(>= 400), so the callsites read
if (resp.status.isError()) .failed else .ok.tested
YOQ_SKIP_SLOW_TESTS=1 zig build test— 2183 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed.zig fmt --checkclean.