Version Packages - #47
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@ingram-tech/nk-api@0.3.5
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
@ingram-tech/nk-auth@0.14.1
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
Updated dependencies [798b39d]
@ingram-tech/nk-billing@0.3.6
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
@ingram-tech/nk-blog@0.1.9
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
Updated dependencies [798b39d]
@ingram-tech/nk-db@2.1.1
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
@ingram-tech/nk-dev@0.13.1
Patch Changes
32ee4ca: Update
guide.mdfor nk-forms 0.3.0, which absorbed@ingram-tech/bot-protection.The shipped guide still listed bot-protection in its package roster as "the
primitive nk-forms builds on" and told agents to import
checkBot/verifyHumanfrom it for non-form endpoints. That package no longer exists; both layers are
exported from the
@ingram-tech/nk-formsroot.The repo was corrected when the packages merged, but that changeset bumped only
nk-forms, so the fix never reached npm — agents on nk-dev 0.13.0 were reading the
old roster.
guide.mddescribes packages other than its own, so a change to anypackage's public surface needs a nk-dev changeset alongside it.
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
@ingram-tech/nk-email@0.6.2
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
@ingram-tech/nk-forms@0.3.1
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
Updated dependencies [798b39d]
@ingram-tech/nk-i18n@0.5.2
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
@ingram-tech/nk-marketing@0.5.2
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
Updated dependencies [798b39d]
@ingram-tech/nk-seo@0.10.1
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.
@ingram-tech/nk-themes@0.2.3
Patch Changes
798b39d: Rewrite the READMEs for an outside reader. These packages are published under an
open-source licence, but the prose addressed the reader as if they worked here:
"the Ingram billing foundation", "every Ingram API looks the same", "the one
shared email client for Ingram sites", "the fleet-uniform view". That framing is
gone, along with the pose it came with — unsourceable claims ("the one SEO
safeguard everyone forgets on Vercel"), negation-reframes, bold scattered on
non-key phrases, and roughly forty mid-sentence em-dashes.
Documented failure modes, gotchas and code examples are unchanged. No API,
identifier, env var or technical claim was touched.