Complete the ProDocs 1.0 roadmap - #12
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 56 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (72)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
What
Completes every published ProDocs roadmap phase and promotes the project to the 1.0 production contract.
Why
ProDocs needs one deterministic, evidence-backed knowledge layer that humans and coding agents can trust, query, review, and keep current from inside the repository. This closes the launch roadmap without leaving partially implemented phases.
Security impact
Repository content remains untrusted data. The deterministic core has no network egress; provider egress is explicit, redacted, bounded, and citation-validated. Plugins are declarative and capability-bounded. Proposal writes require exact approval hashes and are restricted to authored documentation. Runbooks do not invoke a shell. The collaboration server is loopback-first and requires a strong bearer token for non-loopback exposure.
GitHub
mainprotection was verified active: force pushes and deletions are disabled, admin enforcement and conversation resolution are enabled, and all CI/CodeQL/dependency checks are required.Validation
npm audit --omit=dev: 0 vulnerabilitiesnpm pack --dry-runpasses forprodocs@1.0.0