feat(chords): surface actionable rehearsal guidance - #776
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 54 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough활성 rehearsal Workspace에 설정 안내, 단순화 안내, 겹침 경고를 추가했습니다. 공백과 ChangesWorkspace 안내 표시
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to This PR adds validated, display-only rehearsal guidance without changing privileged behavior or external integrations. It is not merge-ready because required security gates and coverage/review prerequisites are not yet terminal-success; those blockers must be resolved or explicitly accepted before merging. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 6 functions across 2 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@opencode-agent address This feature is now Draft because exact head Do not absorb the Undici update into this feature branch. After #751 merges, rebase onto the security-fixed |
|
@coderabbitai review Please review exact current head @opencode-agent Please review the same exact head after current-head checks complete. This is review-only: do not update branches, merge, release, or modify protection. @cwl-noema-review Please independently review this exact head after required checks complete; do not reuse predecessor evidence. |
|
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head63d7c10f8e5277939e846cb3e67d5d509ed3fb19. -
Head SHA:
63d7c10f8e5277939e846cb3e67d5d509ed3fb19 -
Workflow run: 31198228227
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0fb84177a7aed20372de0f50dfc8151045dcbe4b. -
Head SHA:
0fb84177a7aed20372de0f50dfc8151045dcbe4b -
Workflow run: 31586141897
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Scope cleanup is now exact at head |
|
@opencode-agent Please run a fresh exact-head review and coverage pass on |
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head61438c94f4e2e5bfe998a226ddecde9619cdf372. -
Head SHA:
61438c94f4e2e5bfe998a226ddecde9619cdf372 -
Workflow run: 31848217930
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #776 at head |
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #776 at head |
1 similar comment
|
Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #776 at head |
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
opencode-agent
Bot
added
priority: medium
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Re-review request for exact head |
|
Scheduled review-feedback autofix for this PR head.
|
# Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
|
Merged current develop into this branch: resolved shared-file conflicts by including both this feature's callout and the newly landed #957 playable-range work (only CHANGELOG.md conflicted — unioned both Unreleased entries). No behavior dropped. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@opencode-agent Review only current exact head 82dfa1c against protected develop@749511c3ad4000090048718f685c6bee6b3d2c25. Recheck the case-insensitive actionable overlap-warning deduplication and localized aria-labelledby contract, then publish the formal current-head verdict. Do not reuse predecessor evidence or mutate the branch. |
|
Queued @opencode-agent for PR #776 at head |
|
@opencode-agent Review only current exact head b775679 against protected develop@749511c3ad4000090048718f685c6bee6b3d2c25. The change adds only the Unreleased changelog entry for the case-insensitive overlap-warning deduplication; revalidate the two-file behavior, changelog accuracy, and current checks. Do not reuse predecessor evidence or mutate the branch. |
|
Queued @opencode-agent for PR #776 at head |
2 participants
Buyer-visible gap
The original implementation placed setup, simplification, and overlap-warning copy only in an unmounted
ChordsFeature, so the guidance was not reachable from the production desktop workspace. It also hard-coded English labels and could turn missing transposition evidence into an instruction.Current bounded implementation
Exact current head:
8b38e4885e21619cb502eb6d2be25420e6246fd3.Protected base:
develop@acdbea6344fe1231c39535b575f4de35e4c607c9.Exactly five files differ from protected
develop:CHANGELOG.md;apps/desktop/src/features/workspace/Workspace.test.tsx;apps/desktop/src/features/workspace/Workspace.tsx;apps/desktop/src/locales/en/common.json; andapps/desktop/src/locales/ko/common.json.The temporary repair workflow/script and dead-view-only
ChordsFeaturechanges are absent from the live diff. The activeWorkspacenow owns the buyer-visible guidance contract.Repaired evidence boundary
The branch preserves these semantics:
nonesentinels do not become rehearsal actions;A prior repair run exposed an over-broad test assertion that searched the entire Workspace for
/^none$/i, so unrelated legitimateNONE/noneUI values could fail the guidance regression. Current code scopes that assertion to the guidance region (within(guidance).queryByText(/^none$/i)), preserving the actual product invariant rather than banning the word globally.Current head
8b38e488...is a later human-authored zero-tree-diff verification point over the same repaired product tree; predecessor-head evidence is historical only.Exact-head repository state
For exact head
8b38e4885e21619cb502eb6d2be25420e6246fd3, repository gatesci,build-baseline,sbom,release,SAST Semgrep,bandit, andsecret-scan-gateare terminal-success.The exact-head failed repository gates were inspected at job/log level before any edit or rerun:
security-auditrun31897235380, job95042294570, reachesnpm audit --workspaces --audit-level=highand fails on the protected-base setnanoid <3.3.18,pdfjs-dist >=5.6.83 <6.2.108, andundici 7.0.0-7.28.0. Later Python and Rust audit stages are skipped only because npm exits first.Security Scanrun31897235513has terminal-success dependency review, OSV base-vs-head comparison, and Scorecard. Its only failed job istrivy-fsjob95042295116: the filesystem scan and SARIF upload succeed, then the finding gate reports exactly one HIGH finding,CVE-2026-16633forpdfjs-distatpackage-lock.json:6370, explicitly directing remediation to the shared base.This branch changes no dependency or lockfile, while the PR-introduced OSV comparison is clean. The remaining whole-tree JavaScript security baseline is therefore inherited from protected
develop, is neither duplicated nor suppressed here, and remains owned by canonical dependency-security PR #783. Failed inherited-base evidence is not counted as success.All current inline review threads are resolved; the two current-code CodeRabbit findings (normalized-warning deduplication and localized warning-list naming) are explicitly marked addressed in exact head
8b38e488.... Formal OpenCodeCHANGES_REQUESTEDreviews on record bind only to predecessor heads and failed central coverage evidence; there is no qualifying independent non-author exact-current-head approval.No dependency, lockfile, database, network, filesystem, model, or IPC authority change is introduced. Central coverage/review remains gated by
ContextualWisdomLab/.github#1008reaching protected centralmain; do not redispatch an unchanged reviewer head merely to reproduce that prerequisite failure.Merge gate
Keep unmerged until exact-current-head desktop tests, 100% owned statement/branch coverage, lint/typecheck/build, repository CI, SAST/security/SBOM/supply-chain gates, and central coverage/review are terminal-success; #783 is integrated and this branch is revalidated against the then-current protected base; all actionable review threads remain resolved; a qualifying independent non-author last-push approval exists; and branch protection permits merge without bypass.
Queued, in-progress, failed,
action_required, skipped-required, predecessor-head, protected-base, self/author, or administrative-bypass evidence is not success.Supersedes #773 only after protected merge.
Summary by CodeRabbit
새 기능
NONE값은 제외합니다.개선 사항