Skip to content

chore(deps): update all digest updates to 617d74e#827

Merged
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/all-digest
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update all digest updates to 617d74e#827
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/all-digest

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change OpenSSF
yxtay/.github (changelog) action digest aeaed65617d74e OpenSSF Scorecard

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions automation workflow dependencies to use newer versions across multiple processes.

@renovate renovate Bot requested a review from yxtay as a code owner June 16, 2026 02:43
@renovate renovate Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 16, 2026 02:43
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 93385850-c3eb-4046-8e50-ef900a673cf9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a965a95 and 4806772.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/automerge.yml
  • .github/workflows/ossf.yml
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml
  • .github/workflows/scans.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ossf.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/scans.yml
  • .github/workflows/automerge.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Four GitHub Actions workflow files update the pinned commit SHA for their reusable uses: references from aeaed65458776fdb4725919db393d6c21418e1e5 to 617d74e18c8f4dab4c527884375b11f83d57715c. No other workflow logic, triggers, permissions, or inputs are changed.

Changes

Reusable Workflow SHA Bump

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update pinned SHA across all caller workflows
.github/workflows/automerge.yml, .github/workflows/ossf.yml, .github/workflows/pr.yml, .github/workflows/scans.yml
Each workflow's uses: pin is updated from aeaed65 to 617d74e for the upstream reusable workflow reference.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • yxtay/dotfiles#809: Updates the same four workflow files (automerge.yml, ossf.yml, pr.yml, scans.yml) with a prior reusable-workflow SHA bump.
  • yxtay/dotfiles#822: Identical scope — bumps the same pinned commit SHAs in the same four caller workflows, making this PR the direct successor.
  • yxtay/dotfiles#815: Also updates the same set of reusable-workflow uses: pins across the identical four workflow files.

Suggested labels

size/XS

Suggested reviewers

  • yxtay

Poem

🐇 Four little workflows lined up in a row,
A new commit SHA sets them ready to go.
From aeaed65 to 617d74e,
The CI keeps humming, as smooth as can be!
Hop hop hooray, the pins are up to date~ 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating digest references across multiple workflow files from one commit SHA to another.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch renovate/all-digest

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

MegaLinter analysis: Success

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Warnings Elapsed time
✅ BASH shfmt 3 0 0 0 0.02s
✅ JSON prettier 1 0 0 0 0.41s
✅ MARKDOWN markdownlint 4 0 0 0 0.57s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 4 0 0 0 0.17s
✅ YAML prettier 10 0 0 0 0.47s

Notices

📣 MegaLinter 9.5.0 is out! Discover the new features and security recommendations in the release announcement. (Skip this info by defining SECURITY_SUGGESTIONS: false)

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)

  • Documentation: Custom Flavors
  • Command: npx mega-linter-runner@9.5.0 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters BASH_SHFMT,JSON_PRETTIER,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWNLINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWN_TABLE_FORMATTER,YAML_PRETTIER

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security
Show us your support by starring ⭐ the repository

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️MegaLinter analysis: Success with warnings

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Warnings Elapsed time
✅ ACTION actionlint 5 0 0 0.3s
✅ ACTION zizmor 5 0 0 0 0.97s
✅ BASH bash-exec 3 0 0 0.01s
✅ BASH shellcheck 3 0 0 0.09s
✅ BASH shfmt 3 0 0 0 0.02s
✅ COPYPASTE jscpd yes no no 0.81s
✅ EDITORCONFIG editorconfig-checker 59 0 0 0.1s
✅ JSON prettier 1 0 0 0 0.31s
✅ JSON v8r 1 0 0 1.65s
✅ MARKDOWN markdownlint 4 0 0 0 0.72s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 4 0 0 0 0.21s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no no 22.97s
✅ REPOSITORY gitleaks yes no no 1.51s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no no 0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY grype yes no no 54.14s
⚠️ REPOSITORY osv-scanner yes 1 no 0.11s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no no 1.21s
✅ REPOSITORY semgrep yes no no 23.05s
✅ REPOSITORY syft yes no no 1.8s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no no 12.86s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy-sbom yes no no 0.13s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no no 4.27s
✅ SPELL lychee 17 0 0 0.97s
✅ YAML prettier 10 0 0 0 0.6s
✅ YAML v8r 10 0 0 6.66s
✅ YAML yamllint 10 0 0 0.42s

Detailed Issues

⚠️ REPOSITORY / osv-scanner - 1 error
Scanning dir .
Starting filesystem walk for root: /
End status: 38 dirs visited, 128 inodes visited, 0 Extract calls, 5.696885ms elapsed, 5.697086ms wall time
No package sources found, --help for usage information.

Notices

📣 MegaLinter 9.5.0 is out! Discover the new features and security recommendations in the release announcement. (Skip this info by defining SECURITY_SUGGESTIONS: false)

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)

  • Documentation: Custom Flavors
  • Command: npx mega-linter-runner@9.5.0 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters ACTION_ACTIONLINT,ACTION_ZIZMOR,BASH_EXEC,BASH_SHELLCHECK,BASH_SHFMT,COPYPASTE_JSCPD,EDITORCONFIG_EDITORCONFIG_CHECKER,JSON_V8R,JSON_PRETTIER,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWNLINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWN_TABLE_FORMATTER,REPOSITORY_CHECKOV,REPOSITORY_GIT_DIFF,REPOSITORY_GITLEAKS,REPOSITORY_GRYPE,REPOSITORY_OSV_SCANNER,REPOSITORY_SECRETLINT,REPOSITORY_SEMGREP,REPOSITORY_SYFT,REPOSITORY_TRIVY,REPOSITORY_TRIVY_SBOM,REPOSITORY_TRUFFLEHOG,SPELL_LYCHEE,YAML_PRETTIER,YAML_YAMLLINT,YAML_V8R

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security
Show us your support by starring ⭐ the repository

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/all-digest branch from a965a95 to 4806772 Compare June 16, 2026 02:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️MegaLinter analysis: Success with warnings

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Warnings Elapsed time
✅ BASH bash-exec 3 0 0 0.01s
✅ BASH shellcheck 3 0 0 0.1s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no no 25.43s
✅ REPOSITORY devskim yes no no 1.75s
✅ REPOSITORY dustilock yes no no 0.02s
✅ REPOSITORY gitleaks yes no no 1.26s
✅ REPOSITORY grype yes no no 56.27s
✅ REPOSITORY kingfisher yes no no 6.82s
⚠️ REPOSITORY osv-scanner yes 1 no 0.13s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no no 1.69s
✅ REPOSITORY semgrep yes no no 26.13s
✅ REPOSITORY syft yes no no 1.82s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no no 11.63s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy-sbom yes no no 0.19s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no no 5.4s

Detailed Issues

⚠️ REPOSITORY / osv-scanner - 1 error
Scanning dir .
Starting filesystem walk for root: /
End status: 38 dirs visited, 128 inodes visited, 0 Extract calls, 2.812855ms elapsed, 2.813065ms wall time
No package sources found, --help for usage information.

Notices

📣 MegaLinter 9.5.0 is out! Discover the new features and security recommendations in the release announcement. (Skip this info by defining SECURITY_SUGGESTIONS: false)

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)

  • Documentation: Custom Flavors
  • Command: npx mega-linter-runner@9.5.0 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters BASH_EXEC,BASH_SHELLCHECK,REPOSITORY_CHECKOV,REPOSITORY_DEVSKIM,REPOSITORY_DUSTILOCK,REPOSITORY_GITLEAKS,REPOSITORY_GRYPE,REPOSITORY_OSV_SCANNER,REPOSITORY_SECRETLINT,REPOSITORY_SEMGREP,REPOSITORY_SYFT,REPOSITORY_TRIVY,REPOSITORY_TRIVY_SBOM,REPOSITORY_TRUFFLEHOG,REPOSITORY_KINGFISHER

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security
Show us your support by starring ⭐ the repository

@renovate renovate Bot merged commit 5cc37c1 into main Jun 16, 2026
32 of 38 checks passed
@renovate renovate Bot deleted the renovate/all-digest branch June 16, 2026 02:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant