Add scope-aware memory providers - #700
Closed
16francej wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks for this, @16francej — and sorry for the slow response. We're closing this PR. Per We don't want your idea to get lost, so we've captured it in #726 to triage on our side. Please feel free to open an |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add scope-aware memory routing so deployments can combine the built-in notebook with external MCP-backed providers and independently configure recall, explicit writes, automatic capture, and management by scope.
Implements the direction proposed in #600.
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.