Found a way to cross a documented trust boundary? Tell us privately so we can verify it without exposing users or working exploit details.

Do not open a public issue or discussion. Use GitHub private vulnerability reporting.

Include:

• affected Mastermind version and installation method.
• operating system and relevant client/runtime versions.
• minimal reproduction or proof of concept.
• expected and actual security boundary.
• impact, required attacker access, and whether untrusted repository content is involved.
• logs with credentials, tokens, private source, and personal data removed.

If private reporting is unavailable, contact the maintainer through the GitHub profile and request a private channel. Do not send exploit details in a public comment.

• path traversal, unsafe overwrite, or command execution in indexing, setup, install, export, or workflow commands.
• SQL injection or database corruption through crafted repository paths or imported evidence.
• MCP protocol or tool-permission defects that cross the documented read-only and additive-write boundary.
• Lens binding, same-origin, script-injection, CSP, or source-index mutation defects.
• fact, SARIF, coverage, JUnit, OTLP, SCIP, signature, revision, provenance, size, or path validation bypasses.
• workflow artifacts that instruct an agent to expose secrets, bypass explicit approval, or perform destructive actions during normal documented use.
• npm, Cargo, Docker Action, GitHub Actions, or release-provenance defects that can replace or publish unverified artifacts.
• setup/uninstall ownership bugs that modify unrelated client configuration or user files.

• an upstream dependency advisory without a demonstrated Mastermind impact.
• generic model jailbreaks that do not bypass a Mastermind-enforced boundary.
• denial of service that requires the local user to index an intentionally hostile repository, unless it bypasses a documented size/work limit or causes persistent data loss.
• scanner output without a reproducible path and impact.
• social engineering, account compromise, or GitHub/npm/crates.io platform issues outside this repository's control.

We still welcome a private report when scope is uncertain.

Repository source and durable history are untrusted local inputs. Mastermind opens admitted files relative to the selected repository capability without following symlinks or Windows reparse points, rejects special files and path escapes, enforces per-file and aggregate limits, and compares descriptor identity before and after reads. History is derived retrieval evidence. Markdown remains authoritative, and its structural freshness is tracked separately from the source graph.

Concept documentation is derived from untrusted repository text. Rust outer docs, Python owned docstrings, and JavaScript/TypeScript JSDoc are inspected while their declaration AST is available, but raw text is never written to the index or returned by a tool. Only bounded normalized search tokens are stored.

These checks reduce accidental credential persistence. They are not a general secret scanner or a confidentiality boundary for a hostile local machine. The SQLite index remains local derived data and should receive the same filesystem protection as the repository. Count-only omission metadata and query precision notes never include documentation excerpts.

This is a small-maintainer open-source project. Targets are best effort:

We use coordinated disclosure. Please allow up to 90 days by default and avoid publishing details while a fix or registry release is in progress. Material issues may receive a GitHub Security Advisory and CVE. Reporter credit is included when requested.