Repository navigation
feat: v0.5 supervised internship workbench preview - #5
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vkverse
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2026
vkverse
left a comment
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed the v0.5 preview scope and changes. All CI checks passed. The distinction between 18 active tasks and 188 draft outlines is clear. Approved for a supervised pilot; independent intern testing remains pending.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Build the v0.5.0 public-preview scope as a GitHub-native, supervised internship framework.
Verification
On Windows, Node 22.21.0:
GitHub matrix results remain required before merge.
Limitations / review focus
This is not a completed 206-task full-stack curriculum. Advanced tracks and full-stack implementation remain draft. Browser/accessibility outcomes and learner understanding require human review. Prior two-account simulations were AI-assisted, not independent learner validation.
Review active task requirements, training-repo ownership guidance, validation boundaries and Actions permissions. Shared exercise tests are public, not anti-cheating infrastructure.
No Issue is auto-closed; this implements the owner's v0.5 build request.
AI disclosure
AI assistance: Yes. Codex authored this framework implementation, documentation and regression fixtures and ran the commands above. These are maintainer test results, not claims of an intern's independent understanding. Human maintainer review remains pending.