Addressing PR comments - #14
Conversation
Co-authored-by: vNodesV <100853686+vNodesV@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: vNodesV <100853686+vNodesV@users.noreply.github.com>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Renaming test_common.go breaks keeper tests
Renaming this file to test_common.go.skip removes CreateTestInput, TestFaucet, and other helpers from the Go test build. The keeper test suite references these symbols across many *_test.go files (e.g., keeper_test.go, querier_test.go, reflect_test.go), so go test ./x/wasm/keeper will now fail with undefined identifiers unless these helpers are moved/duplicated elsewhere.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| // IsAppModule implements the appmodule.AppModule interface. | ||
| func (AppModule) IsAppModule() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // IsOnePerModuleType implements the depinject.OnePerModuleType interface. | ||
| func (AppModule) IsOnePerModuleType() {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This file defines IsAppModule and IsOnePerModuleType twice (once above and again here). Go does not allow duplicate method definitions on the same type, so the module will not compile with both copies present. Keep only one set of these tag methods.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
@codex[agent] review work done by copilot, get up to speed and finish the review and code adjustments/error corrections. ask questions if usure and, before starting the work, give me your confidence level regarding these instructions and wait for my confirmation before starting. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀 ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Codex
AI
changed the title
|
@copilot get coding! |
No description provided.