Skip to content

Comfortable with oclif instead of yargs? #2

Description

@ryandellolio

@mikecao I have significant interest in kick starting this to display some data as part of a CI process. I would reuse the already existing umami api-client. I need this for an upcoming project so can build it in my fork.

If you would consider it for contribution back, I have found that Oclif is highly opinionated and much easier to work with for verb-based clis. Are you open to heading in that direction or are you committed to yargs?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions