Skip to content

chore: release 0.10.5 - #90

Merged
senamakel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-0-10-5
Oct 15, 2026
Merged

senamakel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-0-10-5

Conversation

@senamakel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Version bump to 0.10.5 to release the tsd v0.11.0 / tinyagents main re-pin from #89 (openhuman#7834). Tag v0.10.5 follows after merge.

Co-authored-by: Medulla <medulla@tinyhumans.ai>
@tinysweeper

tinysweeper Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tiny Sweeper review

Tiny Sweeper reviewed this change across 5 lane(s) and found 0 active actionable finding(s). Detailed lane evidence and any incomplete work are listed below.

State: Incomplete
Priority: none
Reviewed head: 2cad8d5ce278
Updated: 2026-10-15T04:53:12Z

Review snapshot

Change surface Files Review signal Count
Production 0 Active findings 0
Tests 0 Noted findings 0
Documentation 0 Resolved findings 0
Configuration 3 Pending checks/questions 2

Completeness: Incomplete
Test assessment: No supported feature-to-test mapping was available; this does not mean tests are absent or passed.

Features

None identified with supported citations.

Tests

No supported feature-to-test mapping was produced. Test execution is not inferred.

Findings

No active actionable findings.

Could not review: Cargo.toml, crates/tinyjuice-bus/Cargo.toml

Before merge

  • Complete the critique review for crates/tinyjuice-bus/Cargo.toml.
  • Complete the security review for Cargo.toml.
Agent review details

critique

  • Conclusion: Success
  • Scope reviewed: incomplete; unanswered: crates/tinyjuice-bus/Cargo.toml
  • Lane summary: Reviewed 2 files; 0 findings. 1 file could not be reviewed: crates/tinyjuice-bus/Cargo.toml. _The code index is behind this pull request (indexed at `4e0ffbc407b3`), so retrieved context may be out of date._

security

  • Conclusion: Success
  • Scope reviewed: incomplete; unanswered: Cargo.toml
  • Lane summary: Reviewed 2 files; 0 findings. 1 file could not be reviewed: Cargo.toml. _The code index is behind this pull request (indexed at `4e0ffbc407b3`), so retrieved context may be out of date._

tests

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: No behavioural change: nothing outside documentation, configuration and tests.

commits

  • Conclusion: Neutral
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: Nothing sensitive found in what this pull request commits.

description

  • Conclusion: Success
  • Scope reviewed: all assigned evidence
  • Lane summary: This is a release chore: version bumps from 0.10.4 to 0.10.5 in the workspace root and two sub-crate manifests. The diff touches only `version` lines in three `Cargo.toml` files, nothing else. The description says exactly that — a version bump to 0.10.5, referencing the prior PR that was already merged, with no claim about behaviour or code. There is no mismatch between the description and the diff, and nothing in the change itself is defect-reportable: the bumped files contain no code, and the version bump is self-consistent across the three manifests shown. The untrusted-repo-rules mention test placement and dependency rules, but none apply to a manifest version line. The description is accurate, and the change looks sound as far as the diff shows it; a release checklist item like verifying `cargo publish` metadata for the workspace members was not runnable here, but the bump itself is a value-only change and cannot regress behaviour from what is visible in the diff alone; no lookups are needed to settle this — the change calls into nothing beyond the manifests themselves — so this is my final verdict with no findings, as the summary states plainly. _The code index is behind this pull request (indexed at `4e0ffbc407b3`), so retrieved context may be out of date._
Evidence and run details
  • Models: ladder/vectors-oai3, glm-5.3-flash
  • Spend: $0.000529
  • Tokens: 55855 input · 813 output · 0 cached · 35 embedding
Head State Pass summary
2cad8d5ce278 incomplete 0 active finding(s), 0 resolved finding(s) (at 2026-10-15T04:53:12Z)

tinysweeper 0.1.2

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-15T04:50:39.907859Z 2cad8d5 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

  • Run on-demand review

This review includes 3 billable files and costs up to $0.75.

Or wait 51 minutes for your next included review.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: f59491c1-966d-419b-870c-c64e7bab3913
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13af18f and 2cad8d5.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters: 1
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing: 3
  • Cargo.toml
  • crates/tinyjuice-bus/Cargo.toml
  • crates/tinyjuice-module/Cargo.toml
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2cad8d5ce2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread Cargo.toml
rust-version = "1.88"
name = "tinyjuice"
version = "0.10.4"
version = "0.10.5"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Refresh the examples workspace lockfile

When the separate crates/tinyjuice-examples workspace is built with --locked, Cargo now exits before compiling because its committed Cargo.lock still records the path packages tinyjuice and tinyjuice-bus as 0.10.4. Regenerate that workspace's lockfile alongside the root lockfile so locked and frozen example builds accept the 0.10.5 path-package versions.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@tinysweeper tinysweeper Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tinysweeper found nothing blocking, but could not review everything, so this is not an approval: Cargo.toml, crates/tinyjuice-bus/Cargo.toml.

             $0.0005 · 55,855 in / 813 out · 0 cached (0%) · ladder/vectors-oai3, glm-5.3-flash · 35 embedded
critique:    $0.0002 · 25,922 in / 313 out · 0 cached (0%) · glm-5.3-flash
security:    $0.0002 · 25,463 in / 243 out · 0 cached (0%) · glm-5.3-flash
description: $0.0000 · 4,470 in  / 257 out · 0 cached (0%) · glm-5.3-flash

@tinysweeper tinysweeper Bot added the priority: p3 Whenever. Cosmetic, a nicety, or a cleanup with no user visible effect. label Oct 15, 2026
@senamakel
senamakel merged commit 680e44f into main Oct 15, 2026
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority: p3 Whenever. Cosmetic, a nicety, or a cleanup with no user visible effect.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant