docs: replace backtick continuations with splatting in init example#22
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation in README.md Quick start section updated to demonstrate parameter passing using a hashtable object with ChangesDocumentation Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the README’s non-interactive Initialize-Template.ps1 usage example to avoid PowerShell backtick line continuations by using a hashtable splat, improving readability and copy/paste robustness in rendered Markdown.
Changes:
- Replaced backtick-based line continuations in the README init example with a
$templateParametershashtable splat. - Kept the same parameter set (
ModuleName,Prefix,Author,Description,ProjectUri) while improving formatting resilience.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Summary
Initialize-Template.ps1example (README.md) with a$templateParameterssplat.Follow-on tracked separately: tablackburn/ai-agent-instruction-modules#16 (consider shared style guidance to avoid backticks/semicolons in PowerShell snippets).
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit