Harden Vault observability and upgrade handling - #6
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
vault/vaultVaultManualRolloutPendingas an informational signal for Vault's intentionalOnDeleteupgrade workflowWhy
Vault uses
OnDeletewhile Shamir sealing is enabled. The upstreamKubeStatefulSetUpdateNotRolledOutalert therefore treats an intentional pending Vault upgrade as a failed rollout. This keeps normal StatefulSet coverage while giving Vault alerts that reflect actual service health.Auto-unseal
This PR does not invent or commit seal credentials. Auto-unseal requires an independent KMS/HSM or separate Transit Vault; the runbook records the migration steps for when that provider is selected.