Skip to content

docs: align reserved runtime instructions with current client behavior - #210

Merged
sumitake merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/codex/documentation-runtime-policy
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

sumitake merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/codex/documentation-runtime-policy

Conversation

@sumitake

@sumitake sumitake commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

AGENTS.md still described an automatic migration/identity startup preflight and an async safe-mode service that the current routing-only shim does not expose. This correction aligns the contributor instructions and remaining handbook references with the actual coordinator, verified client, separate migration doctor, and caller-owned lineage checks. It follows the main documentation audit in #209.

No runtime, skill, model route, enforcement algorithm, signed artifact, or release version changes. Existing independence, signing, source-safety, and merge requirements remain. The current runtime contract already requires callers to verify reviewer/source evidence; the instructions now describe that boundary accurately.

Validation: 251 repository tests pass on this correction; the unchanged script suite passed 461 tests during the parent audit. Release consistency, latest-only README enforcement, active export safety, secret scan, and diff whitespace pass. The parent audit's full canonical-clone history scan passed. A unique fragment records the documentation correction.

This is a Tier-3/operator-reserved instruction-file correction. Optional distinct-family attempts during the audit yielded no usable review; #208 records the routing diagnostic. No independent approval is claimed. The PR is prepared for operator review and merge, not agent self-merge.

author: codex (Astra)
standing_directives: Read AGENTS.md and public governance; preserve runtime/source boundaries and keep the reserved instruction-file correction separate from the ordinary documentation audit.
tier: 3
cross_check: NEEDS_DISCUSSION - independent review unavailable; operator-reserved documentation correction presented for operator assessment.
post_condition: After operator merge, verify current main instructions, required checks, release consistency, latest-only README enforcement, and no runtime/package-version change.
mcp_coverage_gap: FILED: #208
contributor_rights: OWNER-AUTHORED
operator_reserved: yes - AGENTS.md is specifically reserved by CODEOWNERS; operator must merge.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sumitake

sumitake commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Operator-authorized merge: on 2026-09-08, after the two reserved documentation PRs and unavailable distinct-family review were presented in the documentation-audit task, the operator replied: "Authorized to merge."

This authorizes merging this reserved documentation correction at head 73c93506abf4fd9d13156591d671ba058029d28f. All current CI checks pass or are skipped, the base remains 54147a3c85c532eb5ade8991a4cc519ce4616806, and no review threads are unresolved. No independent reviewer approval or converged panel is claimed. This records operator disposition; it changes no standing merge rule or enforcement.

@sumitake
sumitake marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2026 23:04
@sumitake
sumitake merged commit e2bc16f into main Sep 8, 2026
18 checks passed
@sumitake
sumitake deleted the dev/codex/documentation-runtime-policy branch September 8, 2026 23:04
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-08T23:10:09.378148Z 73c9350 Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review Completed 2026-09-08T23:11:06.501297Z 73c9350 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant