Skip to content

build(deps): companion pin docker/setup-buildx-action v4.4.1 (alert/PR #64) - #65

Merged
sumitake merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/eng/companion-setup-buildx-action-v4.4.1
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

sumitake merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/eng/companion-setup-buildx-action-v4.4.1

Conversation

@sumitake

@sumitake sumitake commented Sep 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Supersedes Dependabot #64. After this lands, leave #64 open for Ops to close as superseded — do not dismiss security alerts (none are open for this pin).

Dependabot already bumped the workflow SHAs on dependabot/github_actions/actions-minor-patch-b530e7f9d1 (8cfdf9f6350d2de879315625f2cc188168e38fb9), but CI fails repository-metadata Workflow policy because scripts/check_workflow_policy.py REVIEWED_ACTION_PINS still expects 37fe6310… / v4.3.0. Dependabot cannot express that hardcoded pin-table update, which is the standing split for a companion PR.

This branch is dev/eng/companion-setup-buildx-action-v4.4.1 from current main (af1f61d). Nothing was pushed onto dependabot/**.

Summary

Review-pin docker/setup-buildx-action to f87e5991a6d7451dcb8d9637bfbc97413f497069 (# v4.4.1) in:

  • REVIEWED_ACTION_PINS["docker/setup-buildx-action"]
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • .github/workflows/vuln-watch.yml

No other workflow uses this action. No tests/fixtures hardcoded the old SHA or v4.3.0. Changelog records the reviewed pin.

v4.4.1 notes (from Dependabot #64): skip BuildKit image pre-pulls for explicit endpoints; v4.4.0 pulled BuildKit before builder creation and used official Buildx releases for the cloud driver.

Test plan

  • Pin table and both workflow uses lines agree on f87e5991a6d7451dcb8d9637bfbc97413f497069 / v4.4.1
  • python3 scripts/check_workflow_policy.py .github/workflows reports workflow policy checks passed
  • python3 -m unittest tests.repository.test_workflow_policy -v — 42 tests, OK
  • python3 scripts/sanitize_public.py --tracked reports sanitization passed
  • GitHub Actions required PR checks green on tip f98e4a8 (repository-metadata, container/buildx, shell bats, go, worker, sanitization, CodeQL, dependency-review). Non-required github-advanced-security / Copilot autofind failed with CAPIError: 400 The requested model is not supported — platform issue, not this pin.
  • Relevant new tests were written FIRST and observed to fail (TDD) — N/A (pin bump only; existing real-workflow checker covers the pin)

PUBLIC-SAFETY checklist

  • This PR contains no deployment identifiers
  • This PR contains no secrets
  • This PR contains no real logs, real configuration, or real runtime state
  • I ran python3 scripts/sanitize_public.py --tracked locally and it reported sanitization passed.
  • python3 scripts/check_repository_metadata.py — N/A (does not touch governance/repository metadata; workflow policy is covered by the checker above)

Additional context

Out of scope: npm PR #61 (@dependabot recreate), Vitest majors #62/#63, and any push onto dependabot/github_actions-actions-minor-patch-* or other dependabot/** refs.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Update REVIEWED_ACTION_PINS and both workflow uses lines so
ci.yml and vuln-watch.yml match the reviewed SHA/comment for
Dependabot #64 (4.3.0 -> 4.4.1). Dependabot cannot express the
hardcoded pin-table update, so this companion lands on a
dev/eng branch instead of dependabot/**.

Co-authored-by: John Osumi <sumitake@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: dca40bfa-c68f-4eff-8eb4-74515446d514


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-21T14:55:09.363925Z f98e4a8 PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-21T14:57:18.731399Z f98e4a8 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@sumitake
sumitake merged commit e8e9c35 into main Sep 21, 2026
19 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants