chore: describe the CSS animation callbacks example without calling the engine native

[MatiPl01]

The example screen says the callbacks are fired by the native CSS engine, but common-app is also what the web example renders, and there the callbacks come from DOM listeners. Describes what fires them instead of where they are implemented.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: cbc03ed6-a176-4346-a8ec-d352d9ea61a2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21a7686 and 6173a34.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/common-app/src/apps/css/examples/animations/screens/miscellaneous/AnimationCallbacks.tsx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the animation callbacks example description to clarify CSS animation lifecycle callbacks.

Walkthrough

The animation example updates its description to identify CSS animation lifecycle callbacks. The description retains the elapsedTime units statement and removes the reference to the native CSS engine.

Changes

Animation callback documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update callback description apps/common-app/src/apps/css/examples/animations/screens/miscellaneous/AnimationCallbacks.tsx	The section description now refers to CSS animation callbacks without mentioning the native CSS engine.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Mergeability Score: ⚪ Minimal · up to 6173a

This is a localized documentation-only wording change with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining after normal checks and review.

Possibly related PRs

• software-mansion/react-native-reanimated#10072: Updates the description in the same AnimationCallbacks.tsx screen.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the wording change for the CSS animation callbacks example.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the change and its relevance to both native and web implementations.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch @matipl01/css-callbacks-example-wording

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[MatiPl01]

Not worth a standalone PR - folding the wording into a later change if it still matters.