Skip to content

declarative style component body definition #47

Description

@Nic30

Hello,

hwt was using component description nearly identical with the one you are using.

I mean the definitions directly in class definition and construct like with when(io.e): for statements. I found out that such a components are very hard to extend or modify. And I guess that one of your goal is to replace typical verilog/vhdl workflow and extensibility plays an important role in this.

I am saying this because it would be very painful to deal with this problem later, it may look clean an nice, but it is significant constrain.

I also added your project in to "similar project list" in hwt readme (i think that we have exactly same goal. I am really bad at writing doc so it may not be visible on first.)
Nic30/hwt@a828e2f

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions