Skip to content

DEVREL-2147 update snowflake on SDS page#1118

Open
kaitlyn-stockton-sp wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
DEVREL-2147-update-snowflake-on-secure-data-share-webpage
Open

DEVREL-2147 update snowflake on SDS page#1118
kaitlyn-stockton-sp wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
DEVREL-2147-update-snowflake-on-secure-data-share-webpage

Conversation

@kaitlyn-stockton-sp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

# Secure Data Share

Secure Data Share (SDS) makes your SailPoint identity data available directly in your own [AWS Snowflake](https://aws.amazon.com/financial-services/partner-solutions/snowflake/) account. The provided dataset comprises structured tables that include identity, audit event, entitlement, role, access profile, account, and application data. Secure Data Share is an alternative to SailPoint's [Search](https://documentation.sailpoint.com/saas/help/search/index.html). SDS uses SQL as the query language, whereas Search uses the [Elasticsearch Query Language](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/query-dsl.html). SQL provides certain advantages over Elasticsearch: joining and aggregating data is easier in SQL, and the Snowflake interface has a built-in SQL explorer and allows you to download your search results in CSV format. SDS also allows you to connect your SailPoint data to your favorite data analytics tools, like [PowerBI](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/connect-data/service-connect-snowflake) and [Tableau](https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/examples_snowflake.htm), further enhancing the reporting capabilities for your SailPoint data.
Secure Data Share (SDS) makes your SailPoint identity data available directly in your own AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform Snowflake account. The provided dataset comprises structured tables that include identity, audit event, entitlement, role, access profile, account, and application data. Secure Data Share is an alternative to SailPoint's [Search](https://documentation.sailpoint.com/saas/help/search/index.html). SDS uses SQL as the query language, whereas Search uses the [Elasticsearch Query Language](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/query-dsl.html). SQL provides certain advantages over Elasticsearch: joining and aggregating data is easier in SQL, and the Snowflake interface has a built-in SQL explorer and allows you to download your search results in CSV format. SDS also allows you to connect your SailPoint data to your favorite data analytics tools, like [PowerBI](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/connect-data/service-connect-snowflake) and [Tableau](https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/examples_snowflake.htm), further enhancing the reporting capabilities for your SailPoint data.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 The intro (line 19) was updated to say SDS supports an 'AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform Snowflake account', but the Requirements section (line 28) still reads 'You must also have an AWS Snowflake account so that SailPoint can synchronize your tenant data with your Snowflake instance.' This contradicts the broadened messaging this PR is meant to introduce — please update the Requirements sentence to match (e.g., 'You must also have a Snowflake account on AWS, Azure, or GCP').

Extended reasoning...

Bug

This PR partially updates the page to broaden Snowflake cloud-provider support from AWS-only to AWS/Azure/GCP, but only the opening paragraph (line 19) is changed. The Requirements section a few lines down (line 28) still states the AWS-only requirement, creating an internal contradiction on the same short page.

Code Path

  • Line 19 (changed by this PR):

    Secure Data Share (SDS) makes your SailPoint identity data available directly in your own AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform Snowflake account.

  • Line 28 (unchanged by this PR):

    You must also have an AWS Snowflake account so that SailPoint can synchronize your tenant data with your Snowflake instance.

Before this PR, both sentences agreed (both said AWS). The PR introduces the contradiction by updating only one of them.

Why Existing Code Doesn't Prevent This

This is plain Markdown documentation — there is no compile-time check that would catch cross-paragraph inconsistencies. A human review (or this comment) is the only safeguard.

Impact

A customer reading the page top-to-bottom will first be told SDS supports three cloud providers, then immediately told in Requirements that an AWS Snowflake account is required. That directly undermines the stated purpose of DEVREL-2147 (broaden the Snowflake cloud-platform messaging) and may steer Azure/GCP customers away from a product they actually qualify for.

Suggested Fix

Update line 28, for example:

-You must also have an AWS Snowflake account so that SailPoint can synchronize your tenant data with your Snowflake instance.
+You must also have a Snowflake account on AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform so that SailPoint can synchronize your tenant data with your Snowflake instance.

Step-by-Step Proof

  1. Open docs/reporting/secure-data-share/index.md after this PR is applied.
  2. Read line 19: it advertises support for AWS, Azure, or GCP Snowflake accounts.
  3. Scroll to the ## Requirements heading and read line 28: it states a customer must have an AWS Snowflake account.
  4. The reader now has two mutually-exclusive statements about supported cloud platforms in the same document, with no qualifier reconciling them. That is the bug.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🌎🌎🌎 Visit the preview URL for this PR HERE
built from commit 2292627

@codey-bot codey-bot Bot deleted a comment from github-actions Bot Jun 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants