Static NIFs - #688
Merged
Merged
Conversation
scrogson
approved these changes
Jun 14, 2025
scrogson
left a comment
scrogson
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Definitely need to add docs for this.
filmor
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 20, 2025 20:35
Member
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The general approach is to create a
staticlibthat depends on the relevant NIF libraries (all Rust-based ones have to be linked together) and then passing it into theconfigurescript of OTP.