std: use OnceLock for SGX argument storage#158182
Conversation
|
r? @clarfonthey rustbot has assigned @clarfonthey. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
|
Looks reasonable, r=me if the SGX folks can also sign off on this. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
7cf798c to
88a3c51
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
|
ping @jethrogb @raoulstrackx @aditijannu Since you haven't replied in two weeks, would like a sign-off from one of the SGX maintainers to go ahead on this. If I don't get a reply for another two weeks I'm just going to go ahead and merge it, since it otherwise looks good to me. |
|
@sardok Can you take a look? |
Just like #158180, using a
OnceLockis much better. Though I guess that in this case astatic mutwould be fine as well...CC @jethrogb @raoulstrackx @aditijannu