-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
fix(compile): Where possible, hint about misplaced deps #16940
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e9aff34
refactor(compile): Be consistent in unused_externs type
epage 71aa9d8
refactor(compile): Track unused_externs as a Set
epage 6c84e95
refactor(compile): Track unused deps as we go
epage 06a8aa7
refactor(compile): Iterate over unused externs, rather than all externs
epage 06db110
refactor(compile): Consolidate almost all lint applicability checks
epage a023b10
refactor(compile): Consolidate untracked checks
epage 9eb7311
refactor(compile): Reduce redundant checks
epage 01d77a4
refactor(compile): Reduce trace noise from normal deps inherited in dev
epage 2ae1bfd
test(lints): Show implicit dev behavior with --all-targets
epage 6f0317a
fix(compile): Where possible, hint about misplaced deps
epage File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a bit weird that the actual core part of this PR is this commit not the fix commit, which people may easily overlook.
The commit message around also doesn't say anything more obvious than "track as we go". It is indeed a refactor commit, though I think it might be worthy adding more context about why this is needed and how this data model unblock the later behavior change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I focus PR titles and descriptions on the user-facing impact.
Originally, the intersection was my end-goal. Everything else was "oh, here is another thing I can do". I did not predict at all where it was going to go. I can edit it in hindsight but that also feels weird (wouldn't have been there if I had split the PR like I considered).
I've at least gone into more detail on the commit itself about my intent with it.