-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
Fix Element#attribute when a namespace URI is bound to multiple prefixes #357
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sjh9714
wants to merge
2
commits into
ruby:master
Choose a base branch
from
sjh9714:codex/20260815-346-attribute-duplicated-namespace-url
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this XML:
root.attributes.get_attribute_ns('url1', 'a').expanded_namealways returns"ns1:a".But
attribute('a', 'url1')is different.The behavior is changed, and it is changed to the opposite way from
get_attribute_ns. Note that the PR description says "No lookup that previously returned an attribute returns a different one", but root1–root3 are counterexamples. It's worth describing this change in the PR description.Though the expected behavior should be decided by the maintainer (@naitoh), I think it may be nice to align with
get_attribute_ns.If we're going to mainly align with
get_attribute_ns, how about first callingget_attribute_ns, and falling back to a custom logic if nothing is found? The compatibility-oriented loose behaviors (matching an unprefixed attribute for the default namespace or for an undeclared namespace URI) can live in the fallback, and it would make it much easier to see how this method differs fromget_attribute_ns.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kou
Since Handle unprefixed attributes in
Element#attributecorrectly #151 caused incompatibility with existing test code, we prioritized compatibility by only adding documentation in Document how Element#attribute matches a namespace #360; however, ac3e8b8 does not affect existing test code.Also,
root1,root2,root3, androot4should be fixed so that they return the same result. The response forns1:ain ac3e8b8 (which is the same as get_attribute_ns) seems reasonable—what do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. Let's do it.