Skip to content

NDC price adjustments#2351

Open
RahelMA wants to merge 2 commits into
remindmodel:developfrom
RahelMA:NDCPriceAdjustments
Open

NDC price adjustments#2351
RahelMA wants to merge 2 commits into
remindmodel:developfrom
RahelMA:NDCPriceAdjustments

Conversation

@RahelMA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@RahelMA RahelMA commented May 26, 2026

Purpose of this PR

The purpose of this PR is to harmonize the price adjustment in the 45_carbonprice NDC realization with the 46_carbonpriceRegi.

/p/tmp/rahelma/NDCupdate/May2026/compScen-PriceAdjust-2026-05-26_11.30.28-REMIND-MAgPIE.pdf
.1 - re-scaling price adjusted

image image

Type of change

Indicate the items relevant for your PR by replacing ◻️ with ☑️.
Do not delete any lines. This makes it easier to understand which areas are affected by your changes and which are not.

Parts concerned

  • ◻️ GAMS Code
  • ◻️ R-scripts
  • ◻️ Documentation (GAMS incode documentation, comments, tutorials)
  • ◻️ Input data / CES parameters
  • ◻️ Tests, CI/CD (continuous integration/deployment)
  • ◻️ Configuration (switches in main.gms, default.cfg, and scenario_config*.csv files)
  • ◻️ Other (please give a description)

Impact

  • ◻️ Bug fix
  • ◻️ Refactoring
  • ◻️ New feature
  • ◻️ Change of parameter values or input data (including CES parameters)
  • ◻️ Minor change (default scenarios show only small differences)
  • ◻️ Fundamental change of results of default scenarios

Checklist

Do not delete any line. Leave unfinished elements unchecked so others know how far along you are.
In the end all checkboxes must be ticked before you can merge
.

  • I executed the automated model tests (make test) after my final commit and all tests pass (FAIL 0)
  • I adjusted the reporting in remind2 if and where it was needed
  • I adjusted the madrat packages (mrremind and other packages involved) for input data generation if and where it was needed
  • My code follows the coding etiquette
  • I explained my changes within the PR, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I checked that the in-code documentation is up-to-date
  • I adjusted forbiddenColumnNames in readCheckScenarioConfig.R in case the PR leads to deprecated switches
  • I updated the CHANGELOG.md correctly (added, changed, fixed, removed, input data/calibration)

Further information (optional)

  • Runs with these changes are here:
  • Comparison of results (what changes by this PR?):

@RahelMA RahelMA requested a review from lecfab May 26, 2026 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant