Fix: use pretty status names in summary tables + some code cleanup - #167
Merged
Conversation
PeterMosmans
self-requested a review
August 19, 2026 12:19
Contributor
|
Thanks for the PR |
PeterMosmans
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The summary tables were using raw retest status values like
not_retested. I implemented (copied) the formatting code used to render the same status names in findings so that it now does the same thing in the summary tables, e.g.Not Retested.I also did some minor code formatting cleanups as it was going astray.