Skip to content

Fix wordings in threads.rst for correctness#149576

Open
manoj-km24 wants to merge 1 commit intopython:mainfrom
manoj-km24:fix-threads-rst-doc
Open

Fix wordings in threads.rst for correctness#149576
manoj-km24 wants to merge 1 commit intopython:mainfrom
manoj-km24:fix-threads-rst-doc

Conversation

@manoj-km24
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes a minor inconsistency in wordings used in Doc/c-api/threads.rst

as the interpreter needs to keep track of which threads may access Python objects.

@read-the-docs-community
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documentation build overview

📚 cpython-previews | 🛠️ Build #32608467 | 📁 Comparing 1b914c7 against main (ebf6d9c)

  🔍 Preview build  

3 files changed
± c-api/threads.html
± whatsnew/3.16.html
± whatsnew/changelog.html

@picnixz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

picnixz commented May 8, 2026

Is it really correct now? there is a difference between the threads that can access objects and threads that are known to access objects. The new wording is too generic and wrong IMO. cc @ZeroIntensity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants