Skip to content

docs: surface CLI feedback command - #255

Open
gregory-boch-prisma wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/feedback-command-discovery
Open

docs: surface CLI feedback command#255
gregory-boch-prisma wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/feedback-command-discovery

Conversation

@gregory-boch-prisma

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • document the direct CLI feedback command in both published package READMEs
  • explain anonymous submissions and the optional reply email
  • clarify the metadata included and point public discussion to GitHub Issues

Why

The feedback intake has received no submissions since 26 August, while the command remains present and the CLI continues to be downloaded. Both package READMEs currently route feedback to GitHub Issues and omit the command, creating a concrete discoverability gap.

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • verified @prisma/cli@8.0.0-rc.13 --help still exposes feedback <message>

This improves discoverability; it does not prove whether any server-side POST failures also contributed.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Essentials

Run ID: 59aef518-71f5-471d-b3c0-105ae8815535

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a97d2c and 07ccaeb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/cli/README.md
  • packages/prisma/README.md

Included review availability: 4 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 5 reviews per hour.


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added guidance for submitting anonymous CLI feedback, including bug reports and feature requests.
    • Documented optional email replies and the metadata included with submissions.
    • Added a reminder to review feedback for secrets before sending.
    • Clarified that GitHub issues remain available for public discussion.

Walkthrough

Updated the CLI and Prisma README Support sections. The documentation now describes anonymous feedback commands, optional email replies, included CLI and system metadata, secret-review guidance, and GitHub issues for public discussion.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 07cca

The updated feedback guidance is ready to merge with no actionable risk identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: documenting the CLI feedback command.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly explains the README updates, feedback command behavior, metadata, public discussion path, motivation, and validation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/feedback-command-discovery
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch docs/feedback-command-discovery

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

npx https://pkg.pr.new/@prisma/cli@255
npx https://pkg.pr.new/@prisma/cli-engine@255

commit: 07ccaeb

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant