Repository navigation
feat(routing): publish and serve no-route revisions #270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5992ef0
feat(routing): publish and serve authoritative no-route revisions
nerdalert a182045
fix(routing): separate embedded provider-hop configuration
nerdalert 3a47b0a
fix(routing): enforce no-route serving across gateways
nerdalert b038438
fix(gateway): reject ambiguous provider-hop backend trust
nerdalert 8675ba9
fix(routing): publish authoritative empty overlays by default
nerdalert b621f18
fix(gateway): integrate no-route serving with config reload
nerdalert fcbf300
fix(operator): align no-route integration with current main
nerdalert c1e474f
style(gateway): apply nightly rustfmt to no-route integration
nerdalert 8e1f40d
fix(grid): complete no-route integration and guard backend reload
nerdalert 805b87e
fix(grid): address routing review feedback
nerdalert File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Make the provider-hop transport schema enforce
mutual_tlsand a nonblank SNI.providerHopEndpointsreusesEndpointTransport, so admission acceptstls,plaintext, andcaSecretRef. The field description and the controller requiremutual_tlswith a nonblank SNI. The controller ignores invalid entries while the overlay is empty, so a misconfigured spec stays undetected until candidates return. Use a dedicated transport type inProviderHopEndpointConfig, then regenerate both manifests.charts/grid-operator/templates/crds/gridnetwork.yaml#L487-L526: restrictmodetomutual_tls, requiresniwithminLength: 1, and removecaSecretRef.deploy/crds/gridnetwork.yaml#L479-L518: apply the same regenerated schema.📍 Affects 2 files
charts/grid-operator/templates/crds/gridnetwork.yaml#L487-L526(this comment)deploy/crds/gridnetwork.yaml#L479-L518🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Source: Path instructions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This remains open. The admission-schema tightening is valid, but is scoped to the separate review/provider-hop-admission-validation branch noted in the PR body. The current controller rejects invalid nonempty provider-hop declarations; an empty withdrawal publishes no provider-hop trust. This PR does not claim admission rejects those invalid fields.
Edit: this is tracked in #321 - Brent
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nerdalertThanks for the clarification. The finding remains open, with admission-schema tightening deferred toreview/provider-hop-admission-validationand tracked in#321.The controller rejects invalid nonempty provider-hop declarations. Empty withdrawals publish no provider-hop trust. This is an admission-validation gap, not a provider-hop trust bypass.
✏️ Learnings added
You are interacting with an AI system.