Add v1.0.6 release review - #145
Draft
erayd wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
v1.0.6 Security Review — New Findings
Two-model review using kimi-k3 and glm-5.2, merged August 19, 2026 against Parcel v1.0.6 (commit
03fec5a).VALIDSIGsigner extraction was forgeable via an unanchored grep (fixed in #144)otpauth://digits/period→ large-allocation DoS in browser-side TOTPclientDataJSON.crossOriginhardcodedfalsefor cross-origin-iframe ceremoniesTotals: 1 CRITICAL (fixed in release, not exploitable in the shipped tree), 1 MEDIUM, 5 LOW. No CRITICAL/HIGH exploitable in v1.0.6;
make testpasses 440/440. Three findings disputed between models (F52C reachability, F57L & F58L finding-vs-residual); canonical severities recorded with both positions in the merged report.F52C was fixed in #144 before release; the v1.0.6 committed tree is not vulnerable.
Task tracking