Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency immutable@>=5.0.0 <5.1.5 to v5.1.8 [security] - #6388

Merged
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-immutable-=5.0.0-5.1.5-vulnerability
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update dependency immutable@>=5.0.0 <5.1.5 to v5.1.8 [security]#6388
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-immutable-=5.0.0-5.1.5-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
immutable@>=5.0.0 <5.1.5 (source) [5.1.55.1.8](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/immutable@>=5.0.0 <5.1.5/5.1.5/5.1.8) age confidence

Immutable.js List 32-bit trie overflow → unrecoverable DoS

CVE-2026-59879 / GHSA-v56q-mh7h-f735

More information

Details

Summary

List#set, List#setSize, List#setIn, List#updateIn (and the functional set / setIn / updateIn) mishandle an index or size in the range [2 ** 30, 2 ** 31):

  • On an empty List the operation enters an uncatchable infinite loop (a tight CPU spin; a surrounding try/catch never regains control). Only killing the worker recovers it.
  • On a populated List (≥ 32 elements — i.e. any array of ≥ 32 items turned into a List by fromJS) the loop allocates without bound → heap exhaustion → the process aborts (SIGABRT, exit 134, or kernel OOM-kill 137). A real crash, not a recoverable error.

The index may be a numeric string, so it can come straight from a request body, URL, or key-path. A single small unauthenticated request is enough.

There is also a companion silent data-corruption issue in setSize:

List([1, 2, 3]).setSize(2 ** 31); // before fix => size 0  (silently cleared)
List([1, 2, 3]).setSize(2 ** 32 + 5); // before fix => size 5  (huge value wraps to 5)
Impact

Availability only. A reachable configuration is any endpoint that routes untrusted input into a List index or a setIn/updateIn key-path — which the extremely common state = fromJS(body); state.setIn(userPath, value) pattern does (config stores, document/collection editors, redux-immutable reducers, JSON-Patch endpoints, etc.).

No confidentiality or integrity impact, no RCE. The companion setSize bug can silently corrupt application state (wrong size) without crashing.

Reproduction (immutable 5.1.7)
import { fromJS, List } from 'immutable';

// 1) Populated List: OOM -> process abort (SIGABRT, exit 134) within ~2s
fromJS({ items: new Array(64).fill(0) }).setIn(['items', '1073741824'], 'x');

// 2) Empty List: hangs forever, uncatchable
List().set(2 ** 30, 'x');

// 3) Silent truncation
List([1, 2, 3]).setSize(2 ** 31); // => size 0
List([1, 2, 3]).setSize(2 ** 32 + 5); // => size 5

A remote 43-byte HTTP request ({"path":["items","1073741824"],"value":"x"}) is sufficient to abort a worker that applies it via state = state.setIn(path, value).

Any index in [2 ** 30, 2 ** 31) works (1073741824, 2000000000, …). An index in [2 ** 31, 2 ** 32) does not crash — it silently wraps (clearing the List) via the same root cause.

Root cause

List stores its values in a 32-wide trie (SHIFT = 5, so each level addresses 5 more bits) and uses signed 32-bit bitwise arithmetic throughout setListBounds() (src/List.js):

  1. Infinite loop (the hang / OOM). The level-raising loop
while (newTailOffset >= 1 << (newLevel + SHIFT)) {
  newRoot = new VNode(
    newRoot && newRoot.array.length ? [newRoot] : [],
    owner
  );
  newLevel += SHIFT;
}

relies on 1 << (newLevel + SHIFT). A JavaScript shift count is taken mod 32, so once newLevel + SHIFT reaches 31 the term goes negative (1 << 31 === -2147483648) and at 32 wraps to 1 (1 << 35 === 8). The comparison then stays true forever and the loop never terminates. On a populated List, each iteration retains a new VNode ([newRoot]), so the heap fills and V8 aborts; on an empty List it spins on CPU without allocating.

  1. Silent wraparound (the setSize corruption). The begin |= 0 / end |= 0 coercion (ToInt32) silently wraps large finite values ((2 ** 31) | 0 === -2147483648, (2 ** 32 + 5) | 0 === 5), producing a wrong resulting size instead of an error.

The threshold is 2 ** 30: that is the largest size for which 1 << (newLevel + SHIFT) stays a valid positive 32-bit integer throughout the loops (newLevel + SHIFT stays ≤ 30).

Remediation

The fix is contained to setListBounds() in src/List.js:

  1. Validate up front, before the lossy | 0 coercion. Compute the intended origin and capacity in full precision and throw a clear, catchable RangeError when they exceed the addressable range (MAX_LIST_SIZE = 2 ** 30). Infinity/NaN are left to the existing | 0 → 0 behaviour (so setSize(Infinity) stays 0 and slice(0, Infinity) still means "to the end").

  2. Stop the shift from wrapping. Replace 1 << exp in the level-raising loops with a helper that uses the cheap bitwise shift while it is exact (exp ≤ 30, the common path including every push/setSize/slice) and falls back to the non-wrapping 2 ** exp only for the rare deep trees reached when a negative origin (unshift / negative index) is normalized to a large positive capacity (exp can reach 35 there, where 1 << 35 would wrap to 8).

This turns every hang, the misleading "Maximum call stack size exceeded", the OOM/SIGABRT, and the silent setSize truncation into one descriptive RangeError, preserves all behaviour for sizes < 2 ** 30, and keeps the hot push path on the fast bitwise shift (the 2 ** exp branch is never reached by non-negative operations).

Is the new limit a breaking change?

No working code is affected. A List could never actually hold ≥ 2 ** 30 values before — the attempt hung, crashed, or silently corrupted the size. The limit was already implicit in the 32-bit trie; the fix only makes it explicit and catchable, mirroring native JS arrays (new Array(2 ** 32)RangeError: Invalid array length). The single observable behaviour change is that setSize(hugeValue), which used to return a silently wrong size, now throws. 2 ** 30 ≈ 1.07 billion entries (~8 GB of pointers alone), far beyond any practical use.

Mitigations (for users who cannot upgrade immediately)
  • Validate/clamp any externally supplied List index or setIn/updateIn key-path segment against a sane maximum before passing it to immutable.
  • Reject numeric path segments ≥ 2 ** 30.
  • Run request handling in a worker that can be restarted, and cap the heap (--max-old-space-size) so an abort is contained.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.7 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

immutable-js/immutable-js (immutable@>=5.0.0 <5.1.5)

v5.1.8

Compare Source

v5.1.7

Compare Source

v5.1.6

Compare Source

  • fix(reverseFactory): read reversedSequence.size in __iterator instead of this #​2196

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
renovate Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 27, 2026 18:08
@renovate
renovate Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) July 27, 2026 18:08
@alwaysmeticulous

alwaysmeticulous Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Meticulous spotted 0 visual differences across 289 screens tested: view results.

Meticulous evaluated ~4 hours of user flows against your PR.

Expected differences? Click here. Last updated for commit 1a896b8 chore(deps): update dependency immutable@>=5.0.0 <5.1.5 to v5.1.8 [secur.... This comment will update as new commits are pushed.

@renovate
renovate Bot merged commit 3b5647c into main Jul 27, 2026
37 checks passed
@renovate
renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-immutable-=5.0.0-5.1.5-vulnerability branch July 27, 2026 23:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants