Bump ubi9/ubi-minimal from 9.8-1780378819 to 1780379098 in /build#642
Bump ubi9/ubi-minimal from 9.8-1780378819 to 1780379098 in /build#642dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
dependabot
Bot
added
area/dependency
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dependabot[bot] The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @dependabot[bot]. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step. Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #642 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 54.27% 54.27%
=======================================
Files 123 123
Lines 6204 6204
=======================================
Hits 3367 3367
Misses 2631 2631
Partials 206 206 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
WalkthroughThis PR updates the UBI minimal base image tag from ChangesBase Image Version Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Important Pre-merge checks failedPlease resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional. ❌ Failed checks (1 error, 1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (13 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
build/Dockerfile.olm-registry (1)
1-26: ⚡ Quick winMissing HEALTHCHECK directive.
The coding guidelines require a HEALTHCHECK to be defined in Dockerfiles. This file does not include a HEALTHCHECK instruction. As per coding guidelines, container security requirements include: "HEALTHCHECK defined".
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@build/Dockerfile.olm-registry` around lines 1 - 26, Dockerfile is missing a HEALTHCHECK; add a HEALTHCHECK instruction that probes the operator registry server endpoint (use the existing grpc_health_probe binary or a short curl against TCP port 50051) to ensure the container reports healthy/unhealthy states; place the HEALTHCHECK after COPY of grpc_health_probe and before CMD, referencing the grpc_health_probe executable and the registry-server port (EXPOSE 50051) so the image will fail fast when registry-server is unhealthy.build/Dockerfile (1)
1-27: ⚡ Quick winMissing HEALTHCHECK directive.
The coding guidelines require a HEALTHCHECK to be defined in Dockerfiles. This file does not include a HEALTHCHECK instruction. As per coding guidelines, container security requirements include: "HEALTHCHECK defined".
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@build/Dockerfile` around lines 1 - 27, The Dockerfile is missing a HEALTHCHECK; add a HEALTHCHECK instruction (e.g., using curl or wget to probe the operator health endpoint like http://127.0.0.1:8080/healthz) to the Dockerfile to satisfy the "HEALTHCHECK defined" requirement—place it after the ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/local/bin/entrypoint"] (and before or after USER ${USER_UID}) and use sensible options (interval, timeout, start-period, retries) so the check runs periodically and fails appropriately (e.g., HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=5s --start-period=10s --retries=3 CMD curl -f http://127.0.0.1:8080/healthz || exit 1).
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@build/Dockerfile`:
- Line 11: Replace the incorrect UBI9 base tag string "FROM
registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.8-1780378819" with the required
"registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.6-1755695350" and add a Docker
HEALTHCHECK directive to build/Dockerfile that periodically probes the service
health endpoint (for example, an HTTP GET to /health) with sensible
interval/timeout/retries so the container reports unhealthy on failure; ensure
the HEALTHCHECK uses a non-zero exit on failure and is placed after the final
CMD/ENTRYPOINT in the Dockerfile.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@build/Dockerfile`:
- Around line 1-27: The Dockerfile is missing a HEALTHCHECK; add a HEALTHCHECK
instruction (e.g., using curl or wget to probe the operator health endpoint like
http://127.0.0.1:8080/healthz) to the Dockerfile to satisfy the "HEALTHCHECK
defined" requirement—place it after the ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/local/bin/entrypoint"]
(and before or after USER ${USER_UID}) and use sensible options (interval,
timeout, start-period, retries) so the check runs periodically and fails
appropriately (e.g., HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=5s --start-period=10s
--retries=3 CMD curl -f http://127.0.0.1:8080/healthz || exit 1).
In `@build/Dockerfile.olm-registry`:
- Around line 1-26: Dockerfile is missing a HEALTHCHECK; add a HEALTHCHECK
instruction that probes the operator registry server endpoint (use the existing
grpc_health_probe binary or a short curl against TCP port 50051) to ensure the
container reports healthy/unhealthy states; place the HEALTHCHECK after COPY of
grpc_health_probe and before CMD, referencing the grpc_health_probe executable
and the registry-server port (EXPOSE 50051) so the image will fail fast when
registry-server is unhealthy.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 94ad69e7-68ab-4180-9ceb-c1d599417d6a
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
build/Dockerfilebuild/Dockerfile.olm-registry
|
|
||
| #### | ||
| FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.8-1779809423 | ||
| FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.8-1780378819 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if 9.6 is still the intended base or if the guideline needs updating
echo "Current Dockerfile uses: ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.8"
echo "Guideline specifies: ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.6-1755695350"
echo ""
echo "Checking both Dockerfiles for version consistency:"
rg -n 'ubi9/ubi-minimal:' build/Dockerfile*Repository: openshift/managed-upgrade-operator
Length of output: 409
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "Searching for HEALTHCHECK directives:"
rg -n '^\s*HEALTHCHECK\b' build/Dockerfile build/Dockerfile* || true
echo ""
echo "Showing end of build/Dockerfile (last ~80 lines) to inspect final-stage directives:"
tail -n 80 build/DockerfileRepository: openshift/managed-upgrade-operator
Length of output: 872
Fix build/Dockerfile: align UBI9 base tag and add HEALTHCHECK
File: build/Dockerfile
Lines: 11
FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.8-1780378819
- Coding guideline requires
registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.6-1755695350, but this file uses9.8-1780378819. build/Dockerfilehas noHEALTHCHECKdirective.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@build/Dockerfile` at line 11, Replace the incorrect UBI9 base tag string
"FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.8-1780378819" with the
required "registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal:9.6-1755695350" and add a
Docker HEALTHCHECK directive to build/Dockerfile that periodically probes the
service health endpoint (for example, an HTTP GET to /health) with sensible
interval/timeout/retries so the container reports unhealthy on failure; ensure
the HEALTHCHECK uses a non-zero exit on failure and is placed after the final
CMD/ENTRYPOINT in the Dockerfile.
Bumps ubi9/ubi-minimal from 9.8-1780378819 to 1780379098. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: ubi9/ubi-minimal dependency-version: 9.8-1780378819 dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
changed the title
dependabot
Bot
force-pushed
the
dependabot/docker/build/ubi9/ubi-minimal-9.8-1780378819
branch
from
be52317 to
218b7d8
Compare
|
@dependabot[bot]: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
1 participant
Bumps ubi9/ubi-minimal from 9.8-1780378819 to 1780379098.