Skip to content

Make a test change for checking the efs rebase - #586

Open
gnufied wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
gnufied:test-efs-rebase
Open

Make a test change for checking the efs rebase#586
gnufied wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
gnufied:test-efs-rebase

Conversation

@gnufied

@gnufied gnufied commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The AWS EFS README adds a “Make a test change.” line near the top. The AWS EFS credential client now logs an informational message after parsing INI credentials and before extracting values from the default section.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, so there is nothing to assess against the changeset. Add a short description of the intent or files changed so reviewers can quickly understand the PR.
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title matches the PR’s test/rebase-related changes and is clear enough for history scanning.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed No Ginkgo test titles were changed; the PR only adds a README note and a controller log line.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed No Ginkgo test code was modified; the PR only changes a README and a production log line, so this test-structure check is not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo tests were added; only a README edit and a non-test log line changed.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo tests were added; the PR only changes a README line and a controller log message, so SNO compatibility is not impacted.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed Only a README note and a stray info log were added; no manifests, replicas, node selectors, affinity, spreads, or PDBs changed.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed The added klog.Infof is inside a helper method, not main/init/TestMain/suite setup, and no new process-level stdout writes were introduced.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No Ginkgo e2e tests were added; the touched files only add a README note and a log line, with no IPv4 or external connectivity assumptions.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR only adds a README note and a log line; no weak crypto, custom crypto, or secret comparison code was introduced.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PASS: Diff only touches a README and one Go log line; no manifests or code changes add privileged, hostNetwork/hostPID/hostIPC, SYS_ADMIN, or allowPrivilegeEscalation.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The only new log line is a static placeholder (tes change) and does not include passwords, tokens, PII, hostnames, or customer data.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from dfajmon and rhrmo July 27, 2026 15:15
@gnufied

gnufied commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/testwith openshift/csi-operator/release-4.23/aws-efs-operator-e2e openshift/aws-efs-csi-driver#132 openshift/aws-efs-utils#46

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 27, 2026

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@pkg/driver/aws-efs/aws_efs_tags_controller.go`:
- Line 149: Remove the placeholder klog.Infof call in the client initialization
flow; do not emit the typoed, context-free “tes change” message in production
logs.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 4b06cc20-e9c7-4aef-9d23-1597f75fa744

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50f79e7 and 8d50a87.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • doc/aws-efs/README.md
  • pkg/driver/aws-efs/aws_efs_tags_controller.go

return nil, fmt.Errorf("error parsing credentials data: %v", err)
}

klog.Infof("tes change")

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Remove the placeholder log before merging.

klog.Infof("tes change") is typoed, context-free, and will pollute production logs every time the client is initialized. Remove this test marker or replace it with a meaningful diagnostic message.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@pkg/driver/aws-efs/aws_efs_tags_controller.go` at line 149, Remove the
placeholder klog.Infof call in the client initialization flow; do not emit the
typoed, context-free “tes change” message in production logs.

@gnufied

gnufied commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

@gnufied

gnufied commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@gnufied

gnufied commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/testwith openshift/csi-operator/release-4.23/aws-efs-operator-e2e openshift/aws-efs-csi-driver#132 openshift/aws-efs-utils#46

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gnufied: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/aws-efs-operator-e2e-extended 8d50a87 link false /test aws-efs-operator-e2e-extended
ci/prow/aws-efs-single-zone-operator-e2e-extended 8d50a87 link false /test aws-efs-single-zone-operator-e2e-extended

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant