lrucache:set(key, value, ttl, flags)
os.execute("sleep " .. tonumber(ttl+2))
local data, stale_data, flags = lrucache:get(key)
data is not nil
lruchache' get method
if node.expire >= 0 and node.expire < ngx_now() then
return nil, val, node.user_flags
end
ngx_now() Returns a floating-point number for the elapsed time in seconds (including milliseconds as the decimal part) from the epoch for the current time stamp from the Nginx cached time (no syscall involved unlike Lua's date library). https://github.com/openresty/lua-nginx-module#ngxnow
Is it better to add an ngx.update_time()？
lrucache:set(key, value, ttl, flags)os.execute("sleep " .. tonumber(ttl+2))local data, stale_data, flags = lrucache:get(key)data is not nil
lruchache' get method
if node.expire >= 0 and node.expire < ngx_now() thenreturn nil, val, node.user_flagsendngx_now() Returns a floating-point number for the elapsed time in seconds (including milliseconds as the decimal part) from the epoch for the current time stamp from the Nginx cached time (no syscall involved unlike Lua's date library). https://github.com/openresty/lua-nginx-module#ngxnow
Is it better to add an ngx.update_time()？