You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally submitted by josephheenan (Joseph Heenan) on 2026-03-16
The last published working group draft of FAPI-CIBA was in 2019 (what became the first implementer's draft).
There have been various updates to the spec spec, but nothing published.
The spec has/is being adopted by Brazil (who use FAPI1) and ConnectID (who use FAPI2) and the certification team is in the process of developing tests for both ecosystems.
I think we should probably publish a new draft and at least an implementer's draft (or perhaps go to final) but we should triage the open issues first I guess.
Originally submitted by Nat (Nat Sakimura) on 2026-03-18
OK. Since we changed the filename from openid-financial-api-ciba.md to fapi-ciba.md, there is no easy way to compare them on the web UI.
Also, the file format was changed from pandoc markdown to XML2RFC markdown, and there are a lot of changes due to this and taking meaningful diffs is not easy.
The conversion to the new filename and the formatting was done in 2023-08-09 (17bf008).
So, taking a diff between the 2019-08-16 version (09415d8) and one version before 17bf008 = 9f3fe5b, and between 17bf008 and the current version (b77092d) might be the way to go.
Activity
bitbucket-import-issues commentedon Jul 2, 2026
OK. Since we changed the filename from openid-financial-api-ciba.md to fapi-ciba.md, there is no easy way to compare them on the web UI.
Also, the file format was changed from pandoc markdown to XML2RFC markdown, and there are a lot of changes due to this and taking meaningful diffs is not easy.
The conversion to the new filename and the formatting was done in 2023-08-09 (17bf008).
So, taking a diff between the 2019-08-16 version (09415d8) and one version before 17bf008 = 9f3fe5b, and between 17bf008 and the current version (b77092d) might be the way to go.
diffs between 09415d8 and 9f3fe5b
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/diff/Financial_API_WD_CIBA.md?at=master&diff1=09415d8a94c9e8d7860be37fb6adeec178562fe4&diff2=9f3fe5bbdfcd82bac2f897a85918b2f68c69696a
diffs between 09415d8 and 17bf008
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/diff/fapi-ciba.md?at=master&diff1=17bf008ef4fe19440e1761d9f57c2cfeabaf18e6&diff2=b77092d8454da13f9bc94c0ef269a1ea9390a464
bitbucket-import-issues commentedon Jul 2, 2026
dedicated call to be arranged
sakimura commentedon Aug 19, 2026
Best Current Practice for Security of Cross-Device Flows
RFC 10027, also known as BCP 247, should also be taken into account.
A new issue, #859, was opened.
Nat to coordinate the dedicated call.
davetonge-mh commentedon Sep 16, 2026
I have opened PRs for the CIBA spec issues I think we can resolve now:
BCP 247 is already referenced.
I have closed #229, #674 and #676 as wontfix. I am proposing we also close #506.
davetonge-mh commentedon Sep 16, 2026
Added this PR to get ready for publication also: #869