Skip to content

Proposal: Define instrumentations/packages - #872

Open
thompson-tomo wants to merge 5 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
thompson-tomo:proposal/#406_Packages
Open

Proposal: Define instrumentations/packages#872
thompson-tomo wants to merge 5 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
thompson-tomo:proposal/#406_Packages

Conversation

@thompson-tomo

@thompson-tomo thompson-tomo commented Aug 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

progresses #406

This seeks to define the concept of instrumentations/packages as a way to group telemetry signals and specifying their requirement. This also serves as a way to standardise usage of instrumentation scopes.

@thompson-tomo
thompson-tomo requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2025 04:03
@thompson-tomo thompson-tomo changed the title Write up of package proposal Proposal: Write up of package proposal Aug 7, 2025
@thompson-tomo thompson-tomo changed the title Proposal: Write up of package proposal Proposal: Offer packages Aug 7, 2025
@jsuereth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are packages versioned? What's the difference between a package and just a repository directly?

@thompson-tomo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Are packages versioned?

Would be versioned by the registry/repository which contains them.

What's the difference between a package and just a repository directly?

A package is a subset of the signals in the repository and provides the definition of what instrumentations should be implementing including the requirement level of the signal is.

@opentelemetry-pr-dashboard

opentelemetry-pr-dashboard Bot commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull request dashboard status

Waiting on reviewers · refreshed 2026-08-04 14:25 UTC

Review the latest changes.

Status above doesn't look right?
  • Just replied or pushed? Anything around or after the refresh time above may not be picked up yet — give it a few minutes.
  • Anything look wrong? Report it with what you expected; it helps us improve the dashboard.

@thompson-tomo thompson-tomo changed the title Proposal: Offer packages Proposal: Define instrumentations/packages Jul 19, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.5%. Comparing base (3fa5c33) to head (cef991a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #872   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   81.5%   81.5%           
=====================================
  Files        130     130           
  Lines      11688   11688           
=====================================
+ Hits        9527    9529    +2     
+ Misses      2161    2159    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@opentelemetry-pr-dashboard

opentelemetry-pr-dashboard Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @thompson-tomo — just a friendly reminder that this pull request is waiting on you.

There are still items that need your attention. See the dashboard status comment for the full list. You don't need to push a code change to hand it back — replying to move each discussion forward is enough, whether that's answering a question, explaining why no change is needed, or asking a follow-up. The dashboard then automatically routes it back to reviewers.

If you believe this pull request is incorrectly routed as waiting on the author, comment /dashboard route:reviewers to route it from waiting on the author to waiting on reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants