Add nil-element validation for Collection transactions in ChunkDataPack - #8690
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 2 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesChunk data pack validation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Bug fix Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The constructor now validates collections and rejects nil transactions with test coverage; no merge-blocking behavior is established. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
b5e3710 to
4aaf05a
Compare
4aaf05a to
257b32f
Compare
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
257b32f to
9f4e1a1
Compare
9f4e1a1 to
543fecf
Compare
Add nil-element validation for [Collection.Transactions] in the [ChunkDataPack] constructor, rejecting CBOR-decoded null transaction elements.
This PR depends on #8689 (and transitively on #8688). It is part of a PR stack that splits up #8668.
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.Summary by CodeRabbit