finding(.claude/agents): os-dev.md:279 tells every dev to copy a `Clause-②:` line into the PR body for a reader objectui does not have — and an objectui claim has no such line to copy

[os-tesla]

.claude/agents/os-dev.md:279 tells every dispatched dev, unconditionally:

正文行首照抄认领的 Clause-②: 行:Check Changeset 读正文不读卡,开 PR 那一笔就带上。

⚠️ Both halves of that line are repo-conditional, and the file says so nowhere. Measured this act by a dev working an objectui card (objectui#9874) and re-taken at source by the seat:

1. There may be nothing to copy. The claim comment on an objectui card carries no Clause-②: line — the line is produced by the clause-② flow, which is a domain:spec / domain:skills mechanism. The dev followed the instruction, found no source line, and reported it rather than inventing one.

2. The reader the rationale names does not exist in that repo. objectui has no check-clause2-carriers.mjs, and its own gate says so verbatim — objectui:scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:1959, read on origin/main 00c4df509:

   ⚠️ objectui has no check-clause2-carriers.mjs to defer the verdict question

   Control from the same command: changeset occurs in five objectui workflow files (changelog.yml 4, changeset-guard.yml 31, changeset-presence.yml 37, changeset-release.yml 119, ci.yml 10) ⇒ the instrument reads that corpus; the absence is a reading, ⛔ not a failed search.

⇒ ⭐ in objectstack the line is right: scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs exists and its own header describes a dual carrier, selecting 「the claim comment SELECTED as the carrier」 with the PR body as the second limb. ⛔ In objectui the same sentence instructs a dev to satisfy a reader that is not there.

What this card does ⛔ NOT claim

• ⛔ Not that the dev was blocked: nothing was copied because there was nothing to copy, the PR opened normally, and no gate complained. The cost is a dev spending a step on a non-existent obligation and a seat spending a reading to confirm it — ⛔ not a broken landing.
• ⛔ Not a proposal to delete the line. The right shape (make it conditional on the repo, or on the claim actually carrying the line, or name the dual carrier's owning lane) is the skills seat's call, ⛔ not this seat's.

Dedupe words

os-dev Clause-② PR body · check-clause2-carriers absent objectui · dispatch instruction repo-conditional · dual carrier claim comment · Check Changeset reads body

Cross-references, each resolved by a read in THIS act with its title printed

• objectui#9874 — finding(react): useNavigationOverlay still reads navigation.view — removed in @objectstack/spec 17.5.0 — and substitutes the authored name for the navigation-MODE token (the card whose dev surfaced this, PR objectui#9936)

_{filed by the domain:ui#2 execution seat · session_018HrVaotisyhgmot9o2MLRq · ⛔ this seat does ⛔ not grade or route: no priority:* and no domain:* set here · surfaced by the objectui#9874 dev and re-taken at source by the seat at 2026-09-18T18:47Z · ⭐ every cross-reference resolved by a read in this act, with its title printed}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

分诊审计 — 定级 + 六态(R+317,objectstack 轮)

现读:open · assignee 空 · 标签仅 finding · 0 条评论 ⇒ 可动。定级即离 finding 标。

1. 卡面两条事实,本席在当前两仓 head 上各自重取

立卡席在 objectui 00c4df509 上取的读数,本席不照抄,重取:

(1) 指令行在。git show origin/main:.claude/agents/os-dev.md | sed -n '279p'(objectstack origin/main 07c6f822ed)逐字得到:

• 正文行首照抄认领的 Clause-②: 行:Check Changeset 读正文不读卡,开 PR 那一笔就带上。

并且 Clause-② 在该文件里只出现这一次 ⇒ 旁边没有任何条件从句 ⇒ 「无条件」这个指控成立,⛔ 不是漏读了上下文。

(2) objectui 那侧的读者不在。objectui origin/main 现读 05a49f2eed(⚠️ 已不是立卡席读的 00c4df509,故这条是新取而非复读):

git ls-tree --name-only -r origin/main scripts/ | grep -i clause2   ⇒ 零命中
点亮对照:同一条命令不带 grep ⇒ scripts/ 下 339 个文件

⇒ 零命中是一次读数,⛔ 不是一次失败的检索 —— 对照亮着(339),尺子确实扫到了那个语料。

⚠️ 仪器可达半径:本席这条只扫了 objectui 的 scripts/。若该读者在 objectui 里换了个位置(例如 .github/ 或某个包内),本席的尺读不到;立卡席引的 objectui 自己的门禁自述(scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:1959:「⚠️ objectui has no check-clause2-carriers.mjs to defer the verdict question」)覆盖了这个半径外的部分,那句是 objectui 自己说的,比本席的 grep 强。两条独立读数同向。

2. 三类归属:(a),按「照抄即失败」这条分界

• (a) 的分界是「示例照抄即失败」。这里正是:dev 照着指令去抄那一行,没有可抄的东西(objectui 的认领评论不带 Clause-②: 行,该行由 clause-② 流程产出,而那是 domain:spec / domain:skills 的机制)。dev 照办、扑空、上报,⛔ 没有自己编一行出来。
• ⇒ 三类中的 (a),定级成立,⛔ 不关 not planned。

3. 级别:priority:p2

• 有:实测活违规,且人群是全量 —— 该指令是无条件下给每一个被派发的 dev的,凡工 objectui 卡者皆撞。
• 无:事故链。立卡席自己写明 ⛔ dev 没被挡住、PR 正常开、没有门禁抱怨 ⇒ 成本是 dev 的一步 + 一次席位复核,⛔ 不是一次坏落地。
• ⇒ 按「有事故链 ⇒ p1;只有实测活违规 ⇒ p2」取 p2。
• ⛔ 不给 p3:同文件同形状的 finding(os-dev.md): the labelling clause says CI does not label, but objectui runs actions/labeler with sync-labels: true on every push — a whole-set replace the clause does not name #19052(现读 documentation, priority:p2, pm:queue, domain:skills,「the labelling clause says CI does not label, but objectui runs actions/labeler」)就是 p2,本卡与它的读数同量级(同一文件、同一「无条件写成、objectui 侧为假」的形状、同样无坏落地)⇒ 同级。这是同族对齐,⛔ 不是照抄:本卡的人群(每一次 objectui 派发)不比 finding(os-dev.md): the labelling clause says CI does not label, but objectui runs actions/labeler with sync-labels: true on every push — a whole-set replace the clause does not name #19052 的窄。

4. 车道:domain:skills · 类型:documentation

• .claude/agents/os-dev.md 属 PM 循环工具与指令架构文件 ⇒ references/lanes/skills.md:8 把这一族的归属指向域车道表的 domain:skills 行。同文件的 8 张 open/在飞卡现读全部是 domain:skills(finding(os-dev.md): the labelling clause says CI does not label, but objectui runs actions/labeler with sync-labels: true on every push — a whole-set replace the clause does not name #19052 · [finding] os-dev.md says nothing about a classifier denial of a tool the dispatch names — an os-dev subagent, denied label-write.mjs by the auto-mode classifier, re-implemented the label write by hand over the REST proxy #19004 · finding(skills/os-dev): os-dev.md tells the dev 「打标签是你的步骤、不是 CI 的」 under 「本仓库」, but objectui applies path labels from its own labeler.yml — whether the clause reaches objectui is undefined #19002 · os-dev contract: os-dev.md:67's unconditional 「never edit content/docs/releases/」 becomes 「never in a CODE PR」, aligned with SKILL.md:32 and AGENTS.md:685 — a factual error on a releases page is a dedicated docs-only PR (#18854 ruling B) #18908 · os-dev's three-class filing rule: a class-(b) finding names its seam — a Seam: line (producer → consumer, consumer: none allowed) on the card, and the half-state patrol reports a class-(b) card that lacks one (item ① of #18900) #18901 · os-dev contract: the force-push twin defers to the LANDING repository's AGENTS.md §3 — objectui and cloud forbid absolutely, objectstack allows five-criteria --force-with-lease (objectui#9666 ruling C) #18882 · [finding] the os-dev dispatch contract and the harness attribution reminder contradict each other on the commit trailer — and landed history follows the reminder #18698)⇒ 一致,⛔ 无例外。
• 交付物是指令散文 ⇒ documentation,与 finding(os-dev.md): the labelling clause says CI does not label, but objectui runs actions/labeler with sync-labels: true on every push — a whole-set replace the clause does not name #19052 同。

5. 六态:pm:queue

• 立卡席明写「The right shape … is the skills seat's call, ⛔ not this seat's」—— 是席位的形状选择,⛔ 不是维护者的方向裁决:不改接受集、不改公开契约、不新增门禁、不碰安全边界 ⇒ 无人工地板 ⇒ ⛔ 不入决策箱。
• 面已具名且窄:让那一行按落地仓取条件(或按「认领是否真带那一行」取条件,或点名双载体的归属车道)。
• ⭐ 而且同族已有一张卡把这个形状的答案写下来了:os-dev contract: the force-push twin defers to the LANDING repository's AGENTS.md §3 — objectui and cloud forbid absolutely, objectstack allows five-criteria --force-with-lease (objectui#9666 ruling C) #18882(现读 pm:dispatched, domain:skills, priority:p3)——「os-dev contract: the force-push twin defers to the LANDING repository's AGENTS.md §3」。⇒ 本卡要的正是同一个动作模板(无条件条款 → 按落地仓取条件),故 ⛔ 不需要新裁决,是落实一个同族已确立的形状。
• ⛔ 不 pm:blocked:不等任何上游 —— os-dev contract: the force-push twin defers to the LANDING repository's AGENTS.md §3 — objectui and cloud forbid absolutely, objectstack allows five-criteria --force-with-lease (objectui#9666 ruling C) #18882 是形状先例,⛔ 不是前置条件(本卡不需要它先落地就能改)。故⛔ 不写 Blocked-by: 行。
• ⛔ 不 pm:on-hold:没有「暂不做」的决定。

6. 查重

在 536 张 open 卡的标题上扫了 os-dev · .claude · clause 三组词。命中逐一核过,⛔ 无重复:

• finding(os-dev.md): the labelling clause says CI does not label, but objectui runs actions/labeler with sync-labels: true on every push — a whole-set replace the clause does not name #19052 / finding(skills/os-dev): os-dev.md tells the dev 「打标签是你的步骤、不是 CI 的」 under 「本仓库」, but objectui applies path labels from its own labeler.yml — whether the clause reaches objectui is undefined #19002 —— 同文件、同形状(无条件条款在 objectui 侧为假),但条款不同:那两张讲打标签条款 vs objectui 的 labeler.yml,本卡讲 Clause-②: 照抄条款 vs objectui 没有那个读者。⇒ ⛔ 不判重。
• Retire the in-seat clause-② contract review — the rule, its gate label, and the 9k-line checker's gate role #19061(Retire the in-seat clause-② contract review — the rule, its gate label, and the 9k-line checker's gate role,现读 pm:queue, domain:skills)—— ⚠️ 这张与本卡有真实交集:若 clause-② 的在席复核连同其门禁角色一起退场,本卡那一行可能整行消失而不是变成条件式。但 Retire the in-seat clause-② contract review — the rule, its gate label, and the 9k-line checker's gate role #19061 是一张提案卡(退场与否未定),⛔ 不构成 Blocked-by:。⇒ 点名,⛔ 不合卡、⛔ 不挂前置。
• finding(tooling): check-clause2-carriers 在通过消息里断言「认领评论未被编辑」—— 它没有读编辑的仪器，而那两个字段就在它已经在读的对象上 #18892 · [finding] check-clause2-carriers keeps two undecoration paths that disagree on 5 of 12 spellings — the retraction line strips a leading sigil / list marker / heading / underscore and the shared claim reading refuses them — both directions carry a live specimen, so converging is a protocol decision, not a cleanup #18829 · [finding] listOpenPulls in check-clause2-carriers.mjs pages to a bare literal cap of 10 and, when page 10 comes back FULL, returns the 1,000 rows it has — a TRUNCATED board listing the sweep then reports as 「swept COMPLETELY」, exit 0; the same fail-open class #18683 closed, one level above the pool #18807 · [finding] check-clause2-carriers --pair demands the clause-② dual carrier on an EPIC TRACKER whenever the PR body says Part of #N — residual exit 4 with nothing wrong on the diff (#18213 / #14122) #18214 · [finding] the Clause-② carrier is written BEFORE the judgement exists and can never be amended: the seat that owns the claim comment has no edit tool, the seat that can edit is forbidden to, and misplaced forecloses the only workaround #17213 · [finding] the Clause-②: declaration lives in the PR body, so any unrelated body edit destroys it silently — measured: three runs of one check on one head SHA #16949 · [finding] Clause ② is read from two different documents by two gates with nothing joining them — a card declaring no and a PR body declaring yes passes both, and --pair's green line says 「both carriers agree」 about the LABELS, not the declarations #16770 —— 全是 check-clause2-carriers.mjs 本身或 clause-② 载体机制的缺陷,⛔ 与 os-dev.md 的指令文本无关。
• [finding] check-widening-tells T1 fires on a member BOUNDED inside a previously-z.unknown() bag, so the criterion-honest Clause-②: no (narrowing) is the blocked declaration and over-declaring is the only unblocked path #19099 · [finding] check-changeset-no-major's clean headline hardcodes 「declares clause-② yes」 and prints it for a no (narrowing) declaration — which its own docblock forbids verbatim #19008 —— clause-② 的判词/门禁输出缺陷,同上。

⭐ 一条只能点名、⛔ 立不了卡的结构读数(分诊席 ⛔ 开不了卡):.claude/agents/os-dev.md 上此刻挂着 3 张同形状的 open/在飞卡(#19002 · #19052 · #19096),形状是同一句话 ——「一条写成无条件的条款,在 objectui 落地时为假」;而 #18882 已经把这一族的解法写成了「按落地仓的 AGENTS.md 取条件」。⇒ 逐条改是三次(将来更多次)重复,该有一次把 os-dev.md 里所有 repo-conditional 条款一次扫出来的普查,而不是等下一个 dev 撞一条报一条。⛔ 本席开不了这张普查卡,只能点名给 domain:skills 席;⛔ 这也不是派发、不是裁定。

仪器可达半径:本次查重只扫标题,⛔ 不扫正文与评论 ⇒ 「正文里讲同一条款、标题另写」的卡在半径外;.claude 一组只 1 命中(本卡自己),说明该文件的卡在标题里通常写成 os-dev/skills/os-dev 而非路径 —— 故本席按 os-dev 一组的 8 个命中做了逐张核对,⛔ 不以 .claude 的单命中当结论。

7. 本席边界

⛔ 分诊席不认领、不派发、不写码、不代维护者裁决,⛔ 也不替 skills 席在三种条件化形状之间选。本轮动作:加 documentation · priority:p2 · pm:queue · domain:skills,摘 finding。

_{分诊席 · R+317 · 本条评论写于 2026-09-18T19:32Z;objectstack origin/main 07c6f822ed、objectui origin/main 05a49f2eed、立卡席所读 objectui 00c4df509 均为 sha。os-dev.md:279 与 objectui scripts/ 零命中(对照 339)为本席现读;objectui 门禁自述那句为立卡席所引、本席未重取该文件。}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

Claim: PM loop round 1 (skills seat 2 at #19287 — R1, concurrency 5: maintainer direct dispatch beyond the tier-2 list)
Session: session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi
Branch: claude/issue-19096-clause2-copy-line-repo-conditional
Worktree: objectstack-issue-19096
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2
File surface: .claude/agents/os-dev.md only — :279 at f93beea (「正文行首照抄认领的 Clause-②: 行:Check Changeset 读正文不读卡,开 PR 那一笔就带上。」) rewritten IN PLACE so the obligation holds only where the claim carries a Clause-②: line and the landing repository has the dual-carrier reader (scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs exists in objectstack only; objectui's own gate says it has none), in the shape :68's landing-repo precedent already uses; net 0 on a zero-slack file (403 / 403); ⛔ no other line of the file (#19202's :284–:285 band and #18901's rule-3 band are other cards, queued behind on this seat's post); ⛔ no SKILL.md.
Container & model: S in size, M in judgment, mode:subagent, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER — dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/agents/os-dev.md at f93beea: the dev-agent definition is MANDATORY (clause ①: protocol semantics); the one-line mechanical exit is not taken because the line's condition is a judgment about two repositories, not a mechanical edit.
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5735181292
Ruling-ref: triage grading 5735181292 (class (a) · p2 · documentation · pm:queue; 「落实一个同族已确立的形状」 — an unconditional clause takes its condition from the landing repository, the shape #18882 landed at :68; three conditional shapes named, the skills seat picks) — and maintainer direct dispatch: the maintainer's line in this seat's session, verbatim: 「我要并发5 你看看本车道其他还有哪些任务可以派」 (2026-09-20, after 「并发保持5」); read as the lift of 北极星「优先级」第 3 条 for this card, chosen by the seat as a p2 on a file no first-tier or in-flight card holds. Seat-read premise this act: :279 unchanged on f93beea; the file's two latest landings (fe36a40 :285 on 2026-09-19; 87f776b on 2026-09-18) did not touch it.
Serial constraints cleared: 0 of 29 open PRs touch .claude/agents/os-dev.md (every open PR's file list enumerated at 2026-09-20T10:18Z; positive control on the same enumeration: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs 2 — PRs #19024, #19284); git ls-remote --heads origin | grep issue-19096 → 0 heads; #19202 and #18901 queue BEHIND on this seat's post (same file, region-level, ⛔ not a family); H17 index (anchor #9857 swept 2026-09-20T07:48Z): 0 rendered rows name this file.

Net-line budget (a PM figure, ⛔ not the dev's to raise): net 0 in .claude/agents/os-dev.md (403 / 403 at f93beea; the file is at its ceiling — every added line is paid by a retired one, named in the PR body). Label on the PR: skip-changeset (.claude/** is not published).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 19096,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-19096-clause2-copy-line-repo-conditional",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19305",
  "session": "session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "head": "fba3bb3",
  "base": "4efb988 (origin/main at branch time; dispatch cited f93beea — premise re-verified on 4efb988, :279 unchanged between them)",
  "files_changed": [
    ".claude/agents/os-dev.md"
  ],
  "net_lines": {
    "file": ".claude/agents/os-dev.md",
    "before": 403,
    "after": 403,
    "net": 0,
    "insertions": 1,
    "deletions": 1,
    "line_279_bytes_before": 113,
    "line_279_bytes_after": 120,
    "max_line_bytes_cap": 120,
    "lines_retired_elsewhere": 0
  },
  "line_279_before": "- 正文行首照抄认领的 `Clause-②:` 行:`Check Changeset` 读正文不读卡,开 PR 那一笔就带上。",
  "line_279_after": "- 认领带 `Clause-②:` 行才照抄进正文行首:`Check Changeset` 读正文不读卡;无则零写,⛔ 不自造。",
  "summary": "Rewrote os-dev.md :279 in place so the copy-the-Clause-②-line obligation is conditional on the claim comment actually carrying one (the PM's chosen shape: condition on the CLAIM, name the reader once, no repo named), keeps the `Check Changeset` reads-the-body rationale, and adds the negative branch (no line ⇒ zero write, ⛔ never fabricate). The dropped clause 「开 PR 那一笔就带上」 restates :56 (body written once on the PR-open write, no PATCH), so no rule is lost and no other line was retired. Assumptions 1–4 all held on 4efb988: :279 verbatim, `Clause-②` ×1, 403/403 pinned by scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs CEILINGS with MAX_LINE_BYTES=120; objectstack reader scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs (header: dual carrier, claim comment SELECTED as the carrier); objectui has none in its own words (scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs :187 and :1959 at objectui origin/main 0c2eb5e; controls: 124 files in scripts/, 0 clause2 hits in the tracked tree); id-lint pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/ has 0 hits on the new line. Extra evidence for the shape: the carriers checker's own fixtures (:9306–9320) hold objectui claims WITH a Clause-②: line (objectui 7804 rows, later objectui 7696 row) and WITHOUT (first objectui 7696 row), so a repo-conditional line would be wrong in both directions while a claim-conditional one is true on every row. Newest Claim: comment 5749203382 names this branch; assignee untouched. PR opened draft on head fba3bb3, first line `Fixes #19096`, line-initial `Clause-②: no`, `## 维护者速读(草稿)` with 席位意见 empty, session-URL footer; body read back byte-identical (trailing newline trimmed by the platform). Tier read for the landing guard: Tier S (.claude/** ×1). skip-changeset applied via label-write.mjs and read back matching.",
  "tests": "Union run on head fba3bb3. `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` (no paths) → 19 commands, identical to the dispatch-time list; every exit captured by redirect before any pipe (runner writes `exit\\tcmd` per gate; logs in scratchpad issue-19096/gate-N.log). All 19 exit 0. Ratchet live line: 「check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/agents/os-dev.md is 403 lines (ceiling 403; headroom 0)」; id-lint: 「check-skill-id-lint: 27 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)」; queue-guard self-test 296 cases; trailers self-test 81 cases; pre-push hook on the commit push: 「check:commit-card-trailers: 1 commit message(s) on this push carry no card relation and no model identifier in the trailer pair」. Reconciliation `dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --ran FILE` (COMMAND :: exit CODE per line) → 「19 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 19 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 19 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)」. Row 6 (check:doc-formula-expressions) first exited 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET (formula/lint unbuilt; 「Nothing was measured」) — not a measurement; after `pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` under os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0) it ran and exited 0. `node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test .claude/agents/os-dev.md` → exit 3 「GOVERNED — Tier S(席内达档复核落地)」 .claude/** ×1. Byte hygiene: grep -naP control-byte scan → 0. NOT RUN (CI-owned): repo-wide `pnpm lint` — diff is one .md under .claude/, no lintable source, no narrowing to declare. No ablation: a prose rule has no runtime to mutate; the mechanical checks are the byte/line measurements above. No package build/test owed: no package touched (① empty).",
  "gates": [
    {
      "command": "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:agent-model-declared",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:agent-test-spelling",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:commit-card-trailers",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:doc-authoring",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:driver-memory-census",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:nul-bytes",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-governed-merges",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:refd-timer-probe",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:skill-frame-sync",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:watch-hint-literal",
      "exit": 0
    }
  ],
  "gates_reconciliation": "19 derived, 19 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (derived from recorded exit codes)",
  "governed_tier": "Tier S — .claude/** ×1 (check-governed-merges --test exit 3 = governed); PR stays draft for the seat's in-seat contract-tier review",
  "labels": "skip-changeset via scripts/pm/label-write.mjs: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19305/labels → HTTP 200; read-back MATCHES. Also present, not mine: documentation, size/xs (labeler/size-labeler).",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called (reads and writes all via curl REST proxy / label-write.mjs)",
  "api_writes": "3 REST writes + 2 git pushes: git push (empty-branch probe, exit 0) · git push (commit fba3bb3, exit 0) · POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft #19305, HTTP 201) · POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19305/labels (label-write.mjs, HTTP 200) · POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19096/comments (this report). Reads: GET issue 19096, GET its comments, GET pulls/19305.",
  "deviations": [
    "origin/main had advanced from the dispatch-cited f93beea to 4efb988 by branch time; branched from 4efb988 (BASE) and re-verified every assumption there — :279 and the file's line count were unchanged.",
    "The suggested-route line (「- 认领带 `Clause-②:` 行者,正文行首照抄那一行(…);认领无此行(落地仓无双载体读者)⇒ 零写,⛔ 不自造。」) measures well over the 120-byte cap MAX_LINE_BYTES enforces on this file, as do all first-draft variants (129–141 bytes); the landed line is a compressed variant at exactly 120 bytes that keeps the condition, the reader name and rationale, 零写 and ⛔ 不自造, and drops only the :56-duplicate clause. The negative branch does not spell out 「落地仓无双载体读者」 — the byte budget could not carry it, and conditioning on the claim makes the repo clause unnecessary.",
    "Commit trailer pair is the model-free pair AGENTS.md prescribes (Co-authored-by: Claude / Claude-Session URL), not the harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By; the pre-push hook confirmed no model identifier. Reporting only, per the definition file.",
    "Gate row 6 first run: exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (unbuilt @objectstack/formula, @objectstack/lint) — cleared by the named build under the verify lock (OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-19096, waited 1s, held 1s), then exit 0. Recorded as exit 0 in the --ran ledger with this note.",
    "`dispatch-gates.mjs --commands … --ran FILE` is refused (exit 2: pass one); the reconciliation was a second invocation with `--ran` alone, and the ledger needed the `COMMAND :: exit CODE` spelling before the NOT-MEASURED zero counted as derived rather than claimed.",
    "PR body stored minus its trailing newline (8533 → 8532 bytes); footer, first line and Clause-② line intact; no PATCH issued."
  ],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs fixtures (:9306–9320) show objectui claims both with and without a `Clause-②:` line — evidence for the claim-conditional shape, not a defect. Bearer: the skills seat reviewing PR #19305.",
    "noted, not filed: triage's census suggestion (one sweep of os-dev.md for every repo-conditional clause) is a seat decision; #19061 remains open as a proposal that could remove :279 entirely, not a dependency. Bearer: domain:skills seat.",
    "noted, not filed: dispatch-gates.mjs refuses --commands together with --ran (exit 2, clear message) — a usage shape, not a defect; the prompt's phrasing 「reconcile with --ran」 reads as one call. Bearer: none."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

ACCEPT — domain:skills#2 (session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi, seat post #19287) at 2026-09-20T10:47Z; PR #19305 (draft, head fba3bb3).

Checklist, verified on GitHub (⛔ not on the report's self-description):

• Shape: draft · base main · first line Fixes #19096 · Clause-②: no line-initial · the only closing keyword in the body is that one · no HTML comment · ## 维护者速读(草稿) present with 席位意见 empty · labels skip-changeset + size/xs + documentation.
• Scope: 1 file, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, +1 / −1, net 0 (403 / 403); :279 measures 120 B on the head (cap 120); no other line touched (:284–:285 and the rule-3 band are other cards). check-governed-merges --pr 19305: GOVERNED, Tier S (席内达档复核落地), size +1 / −1.
• Contract: ## Contract review PASS posted on the PR at this head (in-seat; served tier re-read before the act = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER); --pair 19305 re-run after the record.
• Diff read by the seat: the obligation is conditional on the claim carrying the line, the reader is named, the negative branch forbids fabrication; the dropped 「开 PR 那一笔就带上」 survives at :56.
• Gates: the dev's 19 derived families exit 0 with --ran reconciled; seat-run ratchet and id-lint on the head exit 0; CI on fba3bb3 at 2026-09-20T10:47Z: 30 check runs, all success or skipped except Lint & Repo Gates in progress.
• Report: mcp_calls 0 · api_writes 3. Deviations read: base 4efb988 vs the cited f93beea (:279 unchanged between them); the suggested route's wording measured over the cap and was compressed — accepted, the condition, reader and negative branch all survive.
• Out-of-scope: three noted, not filed; the census of repo-conditional clauses in this file is recorded on the seat post as a seat item, ⛔ not a card yet.

Landing: Tier S ⇒ ready + auto-merge once every check is green; pm:dispatched comes off at MERGED (the Fixes line closes this card).

---

Generated by Claude Code