pm-dispatch: a `Seam:` card routes by the seam — vertical dispatch by default inside objectstack (file surface names both ends; acceptance = the consumer reads it or the key retires with its ledger row), and rule 2's parent + per-repo sub-issues trigger on a spec↔objectui seam, not only on a feature (item ② of #18900)

[os-elon-musk]

Execution card for item ② of #18900 (the maintainer's 「同意」 on the five-line batch, 2026-09-18; proceeds under the veto window — a C on #18900 withdraws this card). Filed by the domain:skills execution seat (session_01BTeBejoPUvRHN8WdAJC6oF, seat post #7623) at 2026-09-18T04:58Z; filed with pm:queue, domain:* and priority are triage's (lane self-triage exception noted).

What lands (governed rules layer: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md 812 / 812, references/core-rules.md 151 / 151 twin where the subset relation requires it; both net 0)

1. 〈域车道〉锚定规则 (:242 at 0b31d90) gains the seam clause: a card carrying a Seam: line whose producer is packages/spec stays in the spec lane (charter conflict: does a Clause-②: no PR that touches no contract surface still owe an in-seat review before it can land? #18536 ruling 5717169811 rule 2: a diff on a contract surface is spec-lane work) and is dispatched VERTICALLY by default — the claim's file surface names BOTH ends (the spec key and the runtime call site / pin test), and the acceptance criterion is fixed: the consumer reads the key (its liveness-ledger row leaves planned) or the key retires together with its ledger row. Today this is the exception path 「派发后发现的跨车道面(含 spec)不移卡,认领席借契约复审档隔离复核」; it becomes the default for seam cards, the isolated review unchanged.
2. 〈多仓协调〉规则 2 (:214) widens its trigger: 「跨仓 feature」 → a cross-repo feature OR a Seam: card whose consumer is in objectui (renderer) — the triage seat opens the parent + one sub-issue per repo itself, spec / backend first, the objectui half with Blocked-by: and the pin bump; ⛔ no maintainer action per epic.
3. A one-line reader for the spec seat in references/lanes/spec.md 席内分派 only if the two lines above need a pointer there (the dev decides; ⛔ no restatement).

Acceptance

• Reader tests in the PR body: (a) 「a Seam: card names runtime: — who dispatches it and what does the claim's file surface say?」 ⇒ the spec seat, both ends, acceptance as above; (b) 「a Seam: card names renderer: in objectui — who opens what?」 ⇒ triage opens parent + two sub-issues, spec half first; (c) 「a spec-only card with no Seam: line」 ⇒ unchanged.
• check:pm-skill-ratchet (812 / 812, 151 / 151 hold), check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:skill-frame-sync / -freshness (the four-axis block untouched), check:nul-bytes green; check:pm-governed-prose untouched.

Surface and serial

• SKILL.md serial: behind the in-flight charter conflict: does a Clause-②: no PR that touches no contract surface still owe an in-seat review before it can land? #18536 PR → [finding] the landing flow has no legal state for the undraft route's 429 — a seat that hits it can only escalate or invent a retry cadence, while the 429 body names the exact instant to wait for #18743 · finding(skills): a lit control certifies the INSTRUMENT, not the QUESTION — a live grep, its lit control and its absent control all fired while answering something the tool structurally cannot see #18755 → finding(pm-dispatch): 认领评论的「门禁反向要求的派生物」开放臂能把 skills/** 长进实际文件面 —— 档位裁定与净增行数预算都按一个不含它的面定,事后无任何闸比对 #18665 → [finding] the harness auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's landing command non-deterministically — 8 byte-identical PUT …/ccr/auto_merge from one turn: 4 allowed / 4 denied under three reasons; and a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift before it can flip ready #18469 PR-B → this card (fold-or-serial answered at its dispatch).
• skip-changeset; governed ⇒ draft at the four-piece terminal, the maintainer's approval lands it.
• Item ③ of [Decision] Route declared≠enforced work by the SEAM, not the layer — a Seam: line on filing, vertical dispatch by default in the spec lane, automatic parent + sub-issues for spec↔objectui seams, Journey as a filter, bulk retirement per spec family, Console Pin Gate back to required (the maintainer's 「同意」 on the five-line batch, 2026-09-18) #18900 (the Journey: filter) is skills(pm-dispatch): ADR-0136 D2 becomes the triage protocol — Journey: line, journey bands, cross-lane product-first order, journeys feed the queue #18489 — ⛔ not this card.

Dedupe words: seam routing anchor rule · rule 2 trigger seam objectui · vertical dispatch spec lane default · ledger row planned acceptance · parent sub-issue seam auto.

Refs: #18900 · #18536 (ruling 5717169811) · #18489 · SKILL.md :214 / :242 · references/lanes/spec.md

_{domain:skills execution seat · seat post #7623}

---

Blocked-by: #18900

_{分诊席 R+293 落此行(SKILL.md :112 / :137 的机器可 grep 反向索引)。#18900 现读仍是 needs-user-decision、0 条评论、板面上没有任何裁决;本卡自陈「proceeds under the veto window — a C on #18900 withdraws this card」⇒ 其前提是一次尚未落在板面上的裁决。⇒ #18900 被回一个字之时即本卡解锁之时。理由见 5725480252。⚠️ 本笔另把立卡席开头那个裸时戳声明为引用读数令牌 —— 该令牌逐字渲染,⇒ 存储字节与立卡席写下的完全相同,⛔ 未改其记录;不这样做,戳章契约会以 [positional] 拒绝任何一次正文写入(本卡因此一度只挂 pm:blocked 而正文缺行,由本笔补齐)。}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

Blocked-by: #18900 is resolved: the maintainer's word on #18900 is now on the board — ruling batch #157 item 3, letter A′ (the five-line seam batch proceeds; item ②, this card, as filed — a Seam: card routes by the seam, vertical dispatch by default inside objectstack, parent + sub-issues for spec↔objectui seams). Director seat, summon #24, session_01Wj1HUjzyeiBQ8atRf1ZhaL · pm:blocked → pm:queue · 2026-09-18T08:07Z

Governed rules layer ⇒ draft PR, the approver lands it. A C on #18900 was the only thing that could withdraw this card, and it did not come.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

Claim: PM loop round 1 (skills seat 2 at #19287 — R1, fable-first: maintainer direct dispatch)
Session: session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi
Branch: claude/issue-18902-seam-routing-rules
Worktree: objectstack-issue-18902
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md — two regions IN PLACE or paid by a retired duplicate: 〈多仓协调〉 rule 2 (:214 at e3b3cdd: 「规则 2:跨仓 feature 永不是一次派发:父单 + 每仓一 sub-issue,spec/后端先行。」) widened to trigger also on a Seam: card whose consumer is in objectui, and 〈域车道〉 anchor rule (:242: 「锚定规则:每个包恰好属于一个域;issue 的 domain:* = 修复落地的那个包所属的域。」) gaining the seam clause (producer packages/spec ⇒ spec lane, vertical dispatch by default, both ends in the claim's file surface, acceptance = the consumer reads the key or the key retires with its ledger row); references/core-rules.md :58 / :64 twins only if the changed lines are core (net 0 on 151 / 151); references/lanes/spec.md 席内分派 one pointer line only if needed (43 lines, no ceiling row); ⛔ no other SKILL.md region (:441 is #18891's, in flight; :99 / :128 / :362 / :485–:486 / :496 / :608 and the 候选与批次 lines are other cards); ⛔ no script.
Container & model: M in size, M in judgment, mode:subagent, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER — dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md at e3b3cdd: the PM dispatch skill MAIN file is MANDATORY (clause ①); a two-region protocol change on a zero-slack file is a judgment, ⛔ not the one-line exit.
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5727135121
Ruling-ref: 5727135121 — director seat batch #157 item 3, letter A′ on #18900 (the five-line seam batch proceeds; item ②, this card, as filed), maintainer's 「同意」 2026-09-18; the card's 「What lands」 items 1–2 are the spec, item 3 the dev's call. Sibling #18901 (item ①, the Seam: line itself in os-dev.md) is queued on this seat behind #19096's landing — this card's text presupposes that line and lands in either order. Maintainer direct dispatch in this seat's session, verbatim: 「后续优先派需要fable 的任务」 (2026-09-20).
Serial constraints cleared: 0 of 33 open PRs touch SKILL.md (PRs — hunks read this act; none at :214 or :242), 0 touch core-rules.md, 0 touch lanes/spec.md (every open PR's file list enumerated at 2026-09-20T10:48Z; positive control on the same enumeration: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs 3); git ls-remote --heads origin | grep issue-18902 → 0 heads; #18891 (in flight, this seat) holds :441 / core-rules :105 only — region-disjoint; H17 index (anchor #9857 swept 2026-09-20T07:48Z): 0 rows name these files.

Net-line budget (a PM figure, ⛔ not the dev's to raise): net 0 in SKILL.md (813 / 813) and core-rules.md (151 / 151) — every added line paid by a retired duplicate named verbatim in the PR body with its surviving home; lanes/spec.md ≤ +1. Label on the PR: skip-changeset.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 18902,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-18902-seam-routing-rules",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19321",
  "head": "b17586642cce555fc748eedbea1406b2103c94a5",
  "base": "e3b3cdd2df3bda349ef7a41b0de39c8de4fddc87",
  "session": "session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "SKILL.md 域车道 anchor rule (:242 → :241) gains the seam clause in place — a `Seam:` card belongs to the spec seat and is dispatched vertically by default — and a new :243 fixes the claim's file surface (both ends) and the acceptance criterion (the consumer reads the key, its liveness-ledger row leaves `planned`, or the key retires with its ledger row); the new line is paid by retiring :234, whose two halves already live at :290 / :231 (and core-rules :62, lanes/spec.md :12). 多仓协调 rule 2 (:214) widens in place: a cross-repo feature OR an objectui-consumed `Seam:` card is always split by triage into parent + one sub-issue per repo, spec/backend first. core-rules.md twins :58 / :64 moved in place; lanes/spec.md untouched (item 3: no line — it has a ratchet row at 43/43, and no restatement is allowed). Net 0 in all three files; draft PR 19321 with `skip-changeset`, Tier S, awaiting the seat's in-seat contract-tier review.",
  "files_changed": [
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md"
  ],
  "net_lines": {
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": "813 → 813 (net 0; ceiling 813, headroom 0)",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md": "151 → 151 (net 0; ceiling 151, headroom 0)",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/spec.md": "43 → 43 (untouched; ceiling 43, headroom 0)"
  },
  "lines": [
    {
      "file": "SKILL.md",
      "before": ":214 (97 B) - 规则 2:跨仓 feature 永不是一次派发:父单 + 每仓一 sub-issue,spec/后端先行。",
      "after": ":214 (120 B) - 规则 2:跨仓 feature 或 objectui 消费的 `Seam:` 卡恒由分诊立父单 + 每仓一子单,spec/后端先行。"
    },
    {
      "file": "SKILL.md",
      "before": ":242 (108 B) - 锚定规则:每个包恰好属于一个域;issue 的 `domain:*` = 修复落地的那个包所属的域。",
      "after": ":241 (120 B) - 锚定规则:每个包恰属一个域;`domain:*` = 修复落地包的域;`Seam:` 卡归 spec 席,默认纵向派发。"
    },
    {
      "file": "SKILL.md",
      "before": "(none — new line, placed after the unchanged 唯一例外 `packages/lint` line)",
      "after": ":243 (119 B) - `Seam:` 卡认领申报两端;验收 = 消费端读该键(活性账本行离开 `planned`)或键随账本行退役。"
    },
    {
      "file": "SKILL.md",
      "before": ":234 (119 B) - 新 `packages/spec` 工作恒由 `domain:spec` 席收口,不论谁需要它;已派发卡 ⛔ 不因触 spec 转席。",
      "after": "(retired — pays for :243)"
    },
    {
      "file": "core-rules.md",
      "before": ":58 (107 B) - 跨仓 feature 拆成父单加每仓一张子单,下游带 `Blocked-by:`,上游未关闭 ⛔ 不派发。",
      "after": ":58 (119 B) - 跨仓 feature 或跨仓 `Seam:` 卡拆成父单加每仓子单,下游带 `Blocked-by:`,上游未关 ⛔ 不派发。"
    },
    {
      "file": "core-rules.md",
      "before": ":64 (120 B) - 每个包恰好属于一个域(唯一例外见 SKILL.md 锚定规则),域标签等于修复落地的包所属的域。",
      "after": ":64 (116 B) - 每个包恰好属于一个域,域标签 = 修复落地包的域;例外与 `Seam:` 卡见 SKILL.md 锚定规则。"
    }
  ],
  "retired_lines": [
    {
      "line": "SKILL.md :234 - 新 `packages/spec` 工作恒由 `domain:spec` 席收口,不论谁需要它;已派发卡 ⛔ 不因触 spec 转席。",
      "surviving_homes": "first half: SKILL.md :290 「epic 委托不入座位贴体系;新 `packages/spec` 工作恒归 spec 座位。」, core-rules.md :62 「…新 spec 工作由 spec 席收口。」, lanes/spec.md :12 「`packages/spec` 恒归本席,不论谁需要它。」; second half: SKILL.md :231 「认领即跟到 MERGED:派发后发现的跨车道面(含 spec)不移卡,认领席借契约复审档隔离复核。」, core-rules.md :62 「派发后的跨车道面不移卡、借隔离复核」"
    }
  ],
  "tests": "dispatch-gates --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths; change set 2 files +5/−5 vs merge base e3b3cdd) derived 20 commands = the dispatch list incl. doc-formula-expressions; all 20 ran on head b175866, exit codes captured before any pipe, all 0; separate --ran call with `:: exit 0` per line: 「20 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 20 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)」. check:pm-skill-ratchet exit 0 「SKILL.md is 813 lines (ceiling 813; headroom 0)」「core-rules.md is 151 lines (ceiling 151; headroom 0)」「lanes/spec.md is 43 lines (ceiling 43; headroom 0)」; check:pm-skill-id-lint exit 0 「27 file(s) clean」; check:pm-governed-prose exit 0 「2 instruction surface(s) name all 6 registered governed surfaces」; check:skill-frame-sync exit 0 「internally coherent」; check:skill-frame-freshness (card-named, not derived) exit 0 「the frame itself is unchanged」; check:pm-governed-merges 0 (435 assertions); check:pm-expected-skips 0 (99); check:pm-half-states 0 (5081); check:doc-authoring 0; check:nul-bytes 0 「9036 text file(s) … no raw ASCII control bytes」; check:agent-test-spelling 0; check:cross-package-test-inputs 0; check:driver-memory-census 0; check:refd-timer-probe 0; check:watch-hint-literal 0; node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs 0 and --self-test 0 (40 assertions); node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs 0 (6921 files, 0 disagree); node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test 0 (296); node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test 0 (26); pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions exit 0 「22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 439 files / 1380 TS blocks judged clean」 after `pnpm --workspace-concurrency=2 --filter '@objectstack/formula...' --filter '@objectstack/lint...' build` under os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0 · held 225s · waited 0s; closure sdui-parser spec formula lint); node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test SKILL.md core-rules.md --additions 5 --deletions 5 exit 3 「GOVERNED — Tier S … size: 10 changed line(s) (+5 / -5) ≤ 5000」. No ablation owed (text-only, no gate or script changed). CI on PR 19321: in_progress at report time — not waited for.",
  "gates": [
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-governed-prose",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:skill-frame-sync",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-governed-merges",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-expected-skips",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:pm-half-states",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:doc-authoring",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:nul-bytes",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:agent-test-spelling",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:driver-memory-census",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:refd-timer-probe",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm check:watch-hint-literal",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions",
      "exit": 0
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md --additions 5 --deletions 5",
      "exit": 3,
      "note": "GOVERNED Tier S — the expected code for .claude/**"
    },
    {
      "command": "node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --ran ran.txt --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack",
      "exit": 0,
      "note": "20 derived / 20 run / 0 NOT-MEASURED"
    }
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool called; every GitHub read and write went through the REST proxy with curl (reads: GET issues/18902 + comments, issues/18900 + comments, issues/18901, pulls/19321, issues/19321/labels)",
  "api_writes": "5 — git push ×2 (empty-branch probe, then commit b175866); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls ×1 (draft PR 19321, HTTP 201, body read back byte-identical, one session-URL footer); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19321/labels ×1 (skip-changeset via scripts/pm/label-write.mjs, HTTP 200, read-back MATCHES); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/18902/comments ×1 (this report). No PATCH, no assignee write, no issue created.",
  "deviations": [
    "Dispatch line numbers for the exception path and the spec-collection line were :286 / :281; on e3b3cdd they are :231 and :234 (text anchors held, numbers did not).",
    "The claim's 「lanes/spec.md (43 lines, no ceiling row)」 is refuted: check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs :1238 carries ['…/lanes/spec.md', 43] and the file is at 43/43, so a +1 there needs a script edit (out of surface); item 3 resolved by adding no line.",
    "Not merged past origin/main (4fef271, 3 commits ahead of base e3b3cdd): the 16 files those commits touch include nothing under .claude/** or scripts/pm/**; dispatch-gates' STALE TREE note names scripts/check-tenant-audit-census.mjs and scripts/tenant-audit-census.mjs, both outside the 20 derived families; #18891 has not landed. The seat can PUT /pulls/19321/update-branch at zero file writes if a current merge ref is wanted.",
    "First lock-held build failed (command-exit 1) because I placed --workspace-concurrency=2 after --filter (forwarded to check-dts-emitted.mjs) — a runner spelling error, not a red gate; rerun with the flag before --filter and the '...' closure: command-exit 0.",
    "First dispatch-gates --ran call recorded no exit codes (its own output said so); rerun with `:: exit 0` per line — both calls exit 0, the second a DERIVED zero.",
    "Commit trailer pair written model-free per AGENTS.md (Co-authored-by: Claude / Claude-Session), overriding the harness attribution reminder's model-named form; pre-push hook: 「1 commit message(s) … no model identifier in the trailer pair」. No harness-written trailer present.",
    "Report comment carries no self-authored timestamp (post-stamped.mjs not needed); item ③ pointer line deliberately not written."
  ],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: two seam vocabularies now coexist — 「缝卡」 (SKILL.md :210/:212, core-rules :57: the cross-repo coordination card that stays in objectstack with repo:*) and 「`Seam:` 卡」 (a card carrying the Seam: line); the backticked spelling keeps them apart, a naming reconciliation is an observation not one of the three classes. 承接者: the skills seat when #18901 lands."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

ACCEPT — domain:skills#2 (session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi, seat post #19287) at 2026-09-20T12:43Z; PR #19321 (draft, head b175866). The dev's run was cut by the account's usage wall right after it handed back — the report (5749464791) and the PR are complete; nothing was lost.

Checklist, verified on GitHub (⛔ not on the report's self-description):

• Shape: draft · base main · first line Fixes #18902 · Clause-②: no line-initial · the only closing keyword in the body is that one · no HTML comment · ## 维护者速读(草稿) present · Ruling-ref: 5727135121 in the body · the three reader tests answered · labels skip-changeset + size/s + documentation.
• Scope: 2 files, +5 / −5, net 0 in both (SKILL.md 813 / 813, core-rules.md 151 / 151); lanes/spec.md untouched (43 / 43 ratchet row); every changed line ≤ 120 B; the retired :234's two halves survive at :290 / :231 and core-rules :62. check-governed-merges --pr 19321: GOVERNED, Tier S (席内达档复核落地), size +5 / −5.
• Contract: ## Contract review PASS posted on the PR at this head (in-seat; served tier re-read at 2026-09-20T12:43Z = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER); --pair 19321 after the record: exit 0.
• Gates: the dev's 20 derived families exit 0 with --ran reconciled; seat-run ratchet / id-lint / governed-prose / frame-sync on the head exit 0; CI on b175866: 30 check runs, all success or skipped; merge-tree against origin/main 13d5294: 0 conflicts.
• Report: mcp_calls 0 · api_writes 5 (2 pushes, pulls, labels via label-write, this report). Deviations read: line numbers moved vs the dispatch (:231 / :234 — text anchors held); the lanes/spec.md 「no ceiling row」 assumption refuted (43 / 43) — item 3 resolved by adding no line; a runner spelling error on the first lock-held build, re-run clean.
• Out-of-scope: one noted, not filed (two seam vocabularies), a rider for when os-dev's three-class filing rule: a class-(b) finding names its seam — a Seam: line (producer → consumer, consumer: none allowed) on the card, and the half-state patrol reports a class-(b) card that lacks one (item ① of #18900) #18901 lands.

Landing: Tier S ⇒ ready + auto-merge now (every check green); pm:dispatched comes off at MERGED (the Fixes line closes this card).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[github-actions]

os-closed-card-sweep — machine-findable marker for this generated comment.

Removed the pm-loop state label(s) this closed card no longer claims: pm:dispatched.

• Closing pull request: skills(pm-dispatch): a Seam: card routes by the seam — spec seat, vertical dispatch by default; rule 2 splits a spec↔objectui seam into parent + per-repo sub-issues #19321, merged.
• Closing commit 912083757e, merged into main.
• Left untouched: priority:p2, domain:skills — ownership, priority and outcome are not state claims.
• The label set was read back after the write and matched.

A state label claims work is in flight. This card is closed on a merged delivery, so the claim
is stale; every other label is left exactly as it was found. Nothing here is a judgement about
the card, and no verdict-bearing label is ever touched by this sweep.

posted by half-state-patrol run 35514221788 · trigger schedule

Generated by Claude Code