Skip to content

ci: install pinned just release without discovery - #108

Merged
JJLiebig merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/publish-just-installer-20261022
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

JJLiebig merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/publish-just-installer-20261022

Conversation

@JJLiebig

@JJLiebig JJLiebig commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The existing installer fails release discovery for Just 1.59.0 on fresh Linux runners, blocking publication before any release checks run. Download the exact official Linux x64 musl archive and verify its pinned official SHA-256 before extracting only the executable into RUNNER_TEMP. This is a release-discovery workaround; the underlying API cause is unproven.

The existing LinuxX64 runner labels, version, qualification/source-SHA gates, tagged package source and OIDC publication path stay in place. After this reviewed merge, a new publish dispatch can qualify and publish the unchanged v2.7.1 tag using the updated reusable workflow.

Validation: the exact installation block ran on native Linux, verified the checksum and printed just 1.59.0; GITHUB_PATH was correct. An incorrect digest was rejected before extraction or PATH write. Workflow formatting and diff checks passed. Exact-head hosted package/browser qualification passed (run39806944478). Configured normal local Review Suite completed clean with conformance CONFORMS (rvw_a326de13); anchored review completed clean.

The new existing publication dispatch passed all gates and published the unchanged v2.7.1 tag: https://github.com/nextidemedia/ui/actions/runs/39808583665. Registry artifact verification passed.

@JJLiebig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-22T15:49:41.692780Z 96cdab9 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: 96cdab98ad

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@JJLiebig
JJLiebig merged commit 8d30383 into main Oct 22, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant