Skip to content

ASR PRs #123

Description

@sappelhoff

Hello @nbara :)

as mentioned in #103 (comment) I have now submitted quite a few PRs for ASR, based on a big Claude orchestrator that ran for a while, comparing the code here to published papers and other publicly available ASR code (never copying verbatim from licensed code).

I have instructed the coding agent to keep the diff minimal, and to open a dedicated PR for each issue.

I think a few PRs can be merged with clear benefits and with low-effort reviews:

☝️ should be merged first as it is needed for other tests to pass

☝️ easy to review /clear benefit

and then the remaining PRs may need some more review / discussion. I think that can come after merging the clear ones, to clean up a little first.

☝️ need some closer look / review

What do you think?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions