Skip to content

ci: remove deprecated zutil-version parameter#190

Closed
ada-x64 wants to merge 1 commit into
nanvix/v2025.09.13from
fix/rm-zutils-version-parameter
Closed

ci: remove deprecated zutil-version parameter#190
ada-x64 wants to merge 1 commit into
nanvix/v2025.09.13from
fix/rm-zutils-version-parameter

Conversation

@ada-x64
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ada-x64 ada-x64 commented May 29, 2026

Bumps the nanvix/workflows reusable workflow pin from v2.0.2 to v2.1.0 and drops the now-removed zutil-version input. The pinned zutil version is read from the .zutils-version file at the repo root.

Upstream: nanvix/workflows#91 / https://github.com/nanvix/workflows/releases/tag/v2.1.0

Bump nanvix/workflows reusable workflow pin from v2.0.2 to v2.1.0,
which removes the zutil-version input in favor of reading from the
.zutils-version file at the repo root.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 29, 2026 15:10
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Nanvix CI GitHub Actions workflow to align with nanvix/workflows v2.1.0, removing the deprecated zutil-version input now that the reusable workflow reads the pinned zutil version from the repository’s .zutils-version file.

Changes:

  • Bump reusable workflow reference from nanvix/workflows@v2.0.2 to @v2.1.0.
  • Remove the zutil-version input from both CI jobs (ci and ci-scheduled).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@ada-x64 ada-x64 marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2026 15:29
@ada-x64
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ada-x64 commented May 29, 2026

Superseded by #189, which now carries the same fix on the automation branch so it can auto-merge.

@ada-x64 ada-x64 closed this May 29, 2026
@ada-x64 ada-x64 deleted the fix/rm-zutils-version-parameter branch May 29, 2026 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants