Fix variable reference in ScanDominatorsForDefs#238
Closed
zchengchen wants to merge 1 commit intomozilla-firefox:mainfrom
Closed
Fix variable reference in ScanDominatorsForDefs#238zchengchen wants to merge 1 commit intomozilla-firefox:mainfrom
zchengchen wants to merge 1 commit intomozilla-firefox:mainfrom
Conversation
Bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035965 Signed-off-by: Zhicheng Chen <84196090+zchengchen@users.noreply.github.com>
No Taskcluster jobs started for this pull requestThe |
Contributor
|
(Automated Close) Please do not file pull requests here, see https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/contributing/how_to_submit_a_patch.html |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bug report:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035965
The loop body uses the parameter block instead of the loop variable i:
Although i is updated on each iteration, it is never used in the loop body.
As a result, the function is effectively equivalent to:
return BlockHasInterestingDefs(block);
The intended dominator-chain traversal does not actually occur.
Expected results:
The loop should call BlockHasInterestingDefs(i), so that it correctly walks up
the dominator tree and checks each ancestor block.
This matches both the function comment:
"Walk up the dominator tree from block to the root and test for any defs"
and the behavior of the related two-argument overload.