Child Safety: add privacy-preserving compliance infrastructure - #347
Draft
moelayyan90 wants to merge 9 commits into
Draft
Child Safety: add privacy-preserving compliance infrastructure#347moelayyan90 wants to merge 9 commits into
moelayyan90 wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
26 tasks
Owner
Author
|
Execution checkpoint — 2026-08-20
Related execution tracker: #348. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this changes
Repositions the institutional child-safety surface as privacy-preserving compliance infrastructure and adds a regulator-facing age-assurance evidence layer.
Added
GET /v1/child-safety/compliance-profileGET /v1/child-safety/age-assurance/schemaPOST /v1/child-safety/age-assurance/evaluateGET /v1/child-safety/regulator-pack/child-safety/age-assurance/child-safety/regulatory-readinessPrivacy / claims boundary
Institutional positioning
The existing base per-event safety API prices remain base API prices only. Regulated enterprise deployments, government pilots, age-assurance-provider costs, independent testing, legal review, certification work, human review and dedicated support are separate scopes.
External work still required before any approval claim
Independent security assessment, empirical age-assurance testing, fairness/accessibility evidence, DPIA / child-rights impact assessment, provider trust verification, jurisdiction-specific legal review, applicable conformity assessment/certification and formal scheme/regulator submission.
Draft PR intentionally: CI and review should validate the implementation before merge.