Skip to content

Update Tasks extension docs to reflect official MCP status - #13

Merged
LucaButBoring merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/revise-readme-experimental-status
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

Update Tasks extension docs to reflect official MCP status#13
LucaButBoring merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/revise-readme-experimental-status

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates repository-facing wording that still described Tasks as experimental, even though io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks is now an official MCP extension. The change aligns top-level docs with current extension status and SEP-2663 framing.

  • README status language

    • Removed “(Experimental)” from the title.
    • Replaced the experimental disclaimer block with a concise official-status intro.
  • Maintainers doc terminology

    • Updated maintainers intro text from “experimental extension” to “extension” for consistency.
# MCP Tasks Extension
This repository contains the official [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) Tasks extension (`io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks`), based on [SEP-2663](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/pull/2663).

Copilot AI linked an issue Aug 2, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Update Readme to remove experimental disclaimers Update Tasks extension docs to reflect official MCP status Aug 2, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from olaservo August 2, 2026 17:26
@LucaButBoring
LucaButBoring marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2026 02:21
@LucaButBoring
LucaButBoring merged commit 8889b9d into main Aug 20, 2026
4 checks passed
@LucaButBoring
LucaButBoring deleted the copilot/revise-readme-experimental-status branch August 20, 2026 02:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should Readme still say experimental?

3 participants