Update asset type handling in ManifestBuilder to include mandatory overview.md#543
Open
jessehouwing wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Update asset type handling in ManifestBuilder to include mandatory overview.md#543jessehouwing wants to merge 1 commit into
jessehouwing wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Fixes: The supplied extension definition isn't valid: 'Uploaded extension package is missing an 'overview.md' file which is a mandatory details asset. Fixes microsoft#402
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enhance the asset type handling in the ManifestBuilder to ensure that the required 'overview.md' file is included in the extension package. This addresses the issue where the uploaded extension package was missing a mandatory details asset, leading to validation errors during the publishing process.
Fixes #402
WARNING this changes the way contents are included in the VSIX. Will require more thougough internal testing to ensure there are no weird edge cases for this.