parse-list - #2053
Conversation
notbelievable
commented
Aug 22, 2026
notbelievable
commented
- DEMO LINK
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
The function getEmployee must be renamed to getEmployees to match the explicit requirement specification. Additionally, the call site that invokes this function (getEmployee(listt)) needs to be updated to use the new function name. The current implementation is inconsistent with the task requirements, which will cause the function to be unfindable if tests or other code expect a function named getEmployees. Please rename both the function definition and all call sites accordingly.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
|
|
||
| function getEmployee(list) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function is named getEmployee but the requirements explicitly state the function should be named getEmployees (plural). Please rename to match the specification.
| sortList(listt); | ||
| getEmployee(listt); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function is called as getEmployee(listt) but if renamed to getEmployees, this line should be updated to match. Also, consider capturing the return value since getEmployees returns an array of employees that should likely be used somewhere.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution is approved. Both sortList and getEmployees functions are correctly implemented with the proper schema - employee objects contain name, position, salary, and age. The sorting logic properly handles descending order by salary using sort((a, b) => getNumber(b) - getNumber(a)), and the helper function getNumber correctly converts salary strings to numbers. All task requirements are satisfied, and no issues were identified in the review.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
