Skip to content

feat: prioritize gguf and safetensors formats for embeddings and LoRAs - #1169

Merged
leejet merged 1 commit into
leejet:masterfrom
wbruna:sd_prefer_gguf_safetensors
Jan 5, 2026
Merged

feat: prioritize gguf and safetensors formats for embeddings and LoRAs#1169
leejet merged 1 commit into
leejet:masterfrom
wbruna:sd_prefer_gguf_safetensors

Conversation

@wbruna

@wbruna wbruna commented Jan 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Models available as multiple file types were likely converted from one another, so we should prioritize native, safer and more efficient formats.

Models available as multiple file types were likely converted from
one another, so we should prioritize native, safer and more efficient
formats.
@leejet

leejet commented Jan 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I’m not entirely sure whether this is necessary here. Generally, GGUF files include the corresponding quantization format in their filenames, so they differ from the original version.

@wbruna

wbruna commented Jan 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

My main concern is with the current .pt priority. I agree it doesn't matter that much for .gguf versus .safetensors (as I also don't see a strong reason for preferring .safetensors over .gguf, either; but I can adapt the PR if there is one).

@leejet
leejet merged commit c5602a6 into leejet:master Jan 5, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants